On 3/7/2014 9:43 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
So I went ahead and applied this for 3.15,
Hey Roland,
Thanks for taking the time to take a look and pick this up.
although I suspect the
verbs API is probably the wrong one.
I will be more than happy to here your concerns, share our approach and
So I went ahead and applied this for 3.15, although I suspect the
verbs API is probably the wrong one. I understand that the mlx5
microarchitecture requires some of this signature binding stuff to go
through a work queue, but conceptually I don't think the
IB_WR_REG_SIG_MR work request makes sense
On 2/24/2014 9:01 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 14:19 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
This patchset Introduces Verbs level support for signature handover feature.
Siganture is intended to implement end-to-end data integrity on a transactional
basis in a completely offloaded
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 14:19 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> This patchset Introduces Verbs level support for signature handover feature.
> Siganture is intended to implement end-to-end data integrity on a
> transactional
> basis in a completely offloaded manner.
>
> There are several end-to-end dat
This patchset Introduces Verbs level support for signature handover feature.
Siganture is intended to implement end-to-end data integrity on a transactional
basis in a completely offloaded manner.
There are several end-to-end data integrity methods used today in various
applications and/or upper l