On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 01:42 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>>> Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks!
>>
>> Doug, we want to run regression over the 4.4
hi
On 11/1/2015 17:00, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> On 10/29/2015 01:42 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks!
>>>
Hi,
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:00:22 +0200 Or Gerlitz wrote:
>
> Stephen, is the framework for linux-next merge tests OK with this tag?
> can you confirm that the
> -next bits of the rdma tree are covered fine?
linux-next fetches the "for-next" tag for that tree.
--
Cheers,
On 10/29/2015 01:42 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks!
>
> Doug, we want to run regression over the 4.4 bits, when do you expect
> for them to show up @ your kernel.org tree?
Sorry, when
On 10/29/2015 10:33 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
> On 29/10/2015 16:16, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> On 10/29/2015 01:42 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford
>>> wrote:
Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Doug, we want to run
On 10/29/2015 11:24 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>>> I can provide a patch for hfi, anything else needed?
>>
>> It breaks all of them in staging, not just hgi1. So, hfi1, amso1100,
>> ipath, and ehca.
>
> hfi1: Does not support FRWR at all, there are just some copy-paste
> sections that
I can provide a patch for hfi, anything else needed?
It breaks all of them in staging, not just hgi1. So, hfi1, amso1100,
ipath, and ehca.
hfi1: Does not support FRWR at all, there are just some copy-paste
sections that supposedly handle it - so I'll drop any sign of it from
the code.
On 10/20/2015 07:33 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Doug, are you planning on taking this for 4.4?
>
> I think this set has converged towards inclusion.
>
> Reminder, this series goes on top of Christoph's
> wr_cleanup patches and iser bounce buffering cleanup.
Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> Yes, I've pulled this in for 4.4. Thanks!
Doug, we want to run regression over the 4.4 bits, when do you expect
for them to show up @ your kernel.org tree? some of them are there but
@ least 3-4 series which you said
Doug, are you planning on taking this for 4.4?
I think this set has converged towards inclusion.
Reminder, this series goes on top of Christoph's
wr_cleanup patches and iser bounce buffering cleanup.
Sagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of
Hi all,
As discussed on the linux-rdma list, there is plenty of room for
improvement in our memory registration APIs. We keep finding
ULPs that are duplicating code, sometimes use wrong strategies
and mis-use our current API.
As a first step, this patch set replaces the fast registration API
to
11 matches
Mail list logo