Hello, Parav.
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:43:20AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > If different controllers can't agree upon the
> > same set of resources, which probably is a pretty good sign that this
> > isn't too well thought out to begin with,
>
> When you said "different controller" you meant
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:28:00AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> Resources are not defined by the RDMA cgroup. Resources are defined
>> by RDMA/IB stack & optionally by HCA vendor device drivers.
>
> As I wrote before, I don'
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:28:00AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Resources are not defined by the RDMA cgroup. Resources are defined
> by RDMA/IB stack & optionally by HCA vendor device drivers.
As I wrote before, I don't think this is a good idea. Drivers will
inevitably add non-sensical
This patchset adds support for RDMA cgroup by addressing review comments
of [1] by implementing published RFC [2].
Overview:
Currently user space applications can easily take away all the rdma
device specific resources such as AH, CQ, QP, MR etc. Due to which other
applications in other cgroup or