Re: [PATCHv1 2/4] RDMA/mlx5: add missing padding at end of struct mlx5_ib_create_srq

2014-06-26 Thread Eli Cohen
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:38:03AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > Le dimanche 11 mai 2014 à 10:12 +0300, Eli Cohen a écrit : > > Acked by: Eli Cohen > > This Acked-by: tag was not applied on commit 43bc889380c2, > in for-next branch (HEAD at ca846ce98ca3). > > PS: Eli, you've made a typo in your

Re: [PATCHv1 2/4] RDMA/mlx5: add missing padding at end of struct mlx5_ib_create_srq

2014-06-05 Thread Yann Droneaud
Hi, Le dimanche 11 mai 2014 à 10:12 +0300, Eli Cohen a écrit : > Acked by: Eli Cohen This Acked-by: tag was not applied on commit 43bc889380c2, in for-next branch (HEAD at ca846ce98ca3). PS: Eli, you've made a typo in your Acked-by :) Regards. -- Yann Droneaud OPTEYA -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [PATCHv1 2/4] RDMA/mlx5: add missing padding at end of struct mlx5_ib_create_srq

2014-05-11 Thread Eli Cohen
Acked by: Eli Cohen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCHv1 2/4] RDMA/mlx5: add missing padding at end of struct mlx5_ib_create_srq

2014-05-05 Thread Yann Droneaud
i386 ABI disagree with most other ABIs regarding alignment of data type larger than 4 bytes: on most ABIs a padding must be added at end of the structures, while it is not required on i386. So for most ABI struct mlx5_ib_create_srq get implicitly padded to be aligned on a 8 bytes multiple, while f