Roland Dreier wrote:
> Don't know for sure, just working through the backlog at patchwork,
> taking the easier/more obvious stuff first and seeing how far I get.
The "IB Netlink Interface and RDMA CM exports" patch set is of relatively small
volume (but great value...) and has gone through detail
> sounds great, so what's on the plate for 2.6.38?
Don't know for sure, just working through the backlog at patchwork,
taking the easier/more obvious stuff first and seeing how far I get.
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to m
Roland Dreier wrote:
> I just got back from a long vacation and I want to try and get some
> things into my 2.6.38 tree first, and then work on userspace stuff in a few
> days.
sounds great, so what's on the plate for 2.6.38?
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin
> Are you planning to look into completing the IBoE support for user
> space any time soon? with v10 of the patch Eli posted four patches to
> libibverbs and two patch to libmlx4
Yes, I just got back from a long vacation and I want to try and get some
things into my 2.6.38 tree first, and then
Eli Cohen wrote:
> This field can have one of the values - IBV_LINK_LAYER_UNSPECIFIED,
> IBV_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND, IBV_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET. It can be used by
> applications to know the link layer used by the port, which can be either
> Infiniband or Ethernet. The addition of the new field does not
This field can have one of the values - IBV_LINK_LAYER_UNSPECIFIED,
IBV_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND, IBV_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET. It can be used by
applications to know the link layer used by the port, which can be either
Infiniband or Ethernet. The addition of the new field does not change the size
of struc
