On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Or Gerlitz ogerl...@voltaire.com wrote:
Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
I don't think this is the forum to discuss vendor bugs.
no way we can commit here a fix for undocumented bug
The bug is documented. What is broken is indicated in the patch
description. The
Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
I don't think this is the forum to discuss vendor bugs.
no way we can commit here a fix for undocumented bug
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky sas...@voltaire.com wrote:
On 18:59 Fri 06 Nov , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
On 09:42 Wed 04 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
When --details selected, if PortCounters has transmit discards, then
query PortXmitDiscardDetails. On reset, if
On 18:59 Fri 06 Nov , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
On 09:42 Wed 04 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
When --details selected, if PortCounters has transmit discards, then
query PortXmitDiscardDetails. On reset, if --details is selected, then
PortXmitDiscardDetails will also be reset.
When --details selected, if PortCounters has transmit discards, then
query PortXmitDiscardDetails. On reset, if --details is selected, then
PortXmitDiscardDetails will also be reset.
Unfortunately, PortSamplesControl:OptionMask can't be trusted to determine
which PortXmitDiscardDetails counters
