Re: [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming

2010-01-25 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
On 07:26 Sat 23 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote: Yes, and how is this different from the original patch? The original patch didn't do this but missed accounting for the switch port 0 configuration. I cannot understand. What do you mean? Remember, that there is a different configuration

Re: [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming

2010-01-16 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
On 15:14 Wed 13 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote: @@ -223,12 +222,20 @@ static int qos_extports_setup(osm_sm_t * sm, osm_node_t *node, if (!(p0-port_info.capability_mask IB_PORT_CAP_HAS_SL_MAP)) return ret; + if

Re: [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming

2010-01-12 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
On 08:35 Thu 07 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote: diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c index f54e995..6bbbfa2 100644 --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@  /*  * Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Voltaire, Inc. All rights

Re: [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming

2010-01-07 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Sasha, On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky sas...@voltaire.com wrote: Hi Hal, On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec     , Hal Rosenstock wrote: Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8

Re: [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming

2010-01-07 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky sas...@voltaire.com wrote: On 13:18 Tue 05 Jan     , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8 SLtoVLMappingTable.

Re: [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming

2010-01-06 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote: Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8 SLtoVLMappingTable. Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com Rebased and Applied. Thanks.

Re: [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming

2010-01-05 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
Hi Hal, On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote: Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8 SLtoVLMappingTable. Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com --- [snip] diff --git

Re: [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming

2009-12-30 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Hi Sasha, On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky sas...@voltaire.com wrote: Hi Hal, On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec     , Hal Rosenstock wrote: Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8

Re: [PATCHv3] opensm: Add support for optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming

2009-12-29 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
Hi Hal, On 14:41 Tue 01 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote: Optimized SLtoVLMappingTable programming reduces the number of MADs needed from O(n**2) to O(n). See IBA 1.2.1 vol 1 p. 843 14.2.5.8 SLtoVLMappingTable. Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com --- Changes since v2: