On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 13:38 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
good debugging, applied thanks.
I do worry (as Moni mentioned) that this doesn't explain why you would
get send failures in this case, but the patch itself is well-explained
and looks obviously correct so I think we should apply it.
Sorry, I was referring to my patch not Eli's.
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 13:41 -0800, Ralph Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 13:38 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
good debugging, applied thanks.
I do worry (as Moni mentioned) that this doesn't explain why you would
get send failures in this
Sorry, I was referring to my patch not Eli's.
Heh, I never would have said anything about your patch was obvious.
I skimmed yours once but I do want to read it more carefully.
Did you ever say what test case you are using to provoke the problem you're
fixing?
--
Roland Dreier
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 13:52 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
Sorry, I was referring to my patch not Eli's.
Heh, I never would have said anything about your patch was obvious.
I skimmed yours once but I do want to read it more carefully.
Did you ever say what test case you are using to provoke
