Re: [ewg] [PATCHv8 03/11] IB/umad: Enable support only for IB ports

2010-05-17 Thread Eli Cohen
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 08:21:29AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: Eli, any reason not to let reading (e.g perfquery) the HCA/port traffic counters with IBoE? RoCE assumes Eth management practices (including performance management). But this is an interesting idea that we can consider for the

Re: [ewg] [PATCHv8 03/11] IB/umad: Enable support only for IB ports

2010-05-15 Thread Or Gerlitz
Eli Cohen wrote: Roland Dreier wrote: Why do we not allow umad for IBoE ports? I understand there's no QP0 but why can't userspace use QP1 just like for IB link layer ports? Currently QP1 is only used by the CM protocol which is implemented in the kernel. Since we handle the iboe

Re: [ewg] [PATCHv8 03/11] IB/umad: Enable support only for IB ports

2010-05-06 Thread Eli Cohen
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 03:11:09PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: Why do we not allow umad for IBoE ports? I understand there's no QP0 but why can't userspace use QP1 just like for IB link layer ports? Currently QP1 is only used by the CM protocol which is implemented in the kernel. Since we