On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:41:59AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi folks,
I am attempting to implement SMB Direct (aka SMB over RDMA) for Samba.
For historical, protocol and performance reasons I believe that I need
to write a character driver that offloads RDMA stuff to the kernel.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:41:59AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
[Deletia to be addressed later]
From what I read about the SMB protocol it looks completely valid to
bypass the TCP first stage and go
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:17:11PM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
From what I read about the SMB protocol it looks completely valid to
bypass the TCP first stage and go directly to RDMA. Or go from TCP to
TCP, or RDMA to TCP, or whatever.
Microsoft tells me that they never do an RDMA-only
Hi folks,
I am attempting to implement SMB Direct (aka SMB over RDMA) for Samba.
For historical, protocol and performance reasons I believe that I need
to write a character driver that offloads RDMA stuff to the kernel.
Briefly, these reasons are:
1. Samba forks a new smbd when each incoming
Hi folks,
I am attempting to implement SMB Direct (aka SMB over RDMA) for Samba.
For historical, protocol and performance reasons I believe that I need
to write a character driver that offloads RDMA stuff to the kernel.
Briefly, these reasons are:
1. Samba forks a new smbd when each
