> For the UDP port used by the usNIC QP, the usnic_verbs kernel driver
> requires user space to pass a file descriptor of a regular UDP socket down
> at create_qp time. The reference count on this socket is incremented to
> make sure that the socket can't disappear out from under us. Then an RX
>
On Apr 28, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> Is the concern here about CM issues or the UDP ports used by the actual
>> usNIC RQs?
>
> UDP port space sharing
For the UDP port used by the usNIC QP, the usnic_verbs kernel driver requires
user space to pass a file descriptor of a regular U
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 12:56 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:24:35PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:53 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
>
> > Having some of it refer to things as IBOE and some as ROCE would be
> > similarly confusing, and switching existi
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 22:11 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:24:35PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:53 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
> >
> >> Having some of it refer to things as IBOE and some a
> Is the concern here about CM issues or the UDP ports used by the actual
> usNIC RQs?
UDP port space sharing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-inf
On Apr 28, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>>> Keep in mind that this enum was Liran's response to Michael's original
>>> patch. In the enum in Michael's patch, there was both USNIC and
>>> USNIC_UDP.
>>
>> Right! That's why I'm confused. Seems wrong to drop it, right?
>
> I think the ori
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:24:35PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:53 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
>
>> Having some of it refer to things as IBOE and some as ROCE would be
>> similarly confusing, and switching existing IB
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:24:35PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:53 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
> Having some of it refer to things as IBOE and some as ROCE would be
> similarly confusing, and switching existing IBOE usage to ROCE would
> cause pain to people with out of tree
On 04/28/2015 03:24 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
[snip]
Also wondering, why add "UDP" to USNIC, is there a different USNIC?
>>>
>>> Yes, there are two transports, one a distinct ethertype and one that
>>> encapsulates USNIC in UDP.
>>
>> But this new enum isn't about transport, it's about protoco
> > Keep in mind that this enum was Liran's response to Michael's original
> > patch. In the enum in Michael's patch, there was both USNIC and
> > USNIC_UDP.
>
> Right! That's why I'm confused. Seems wrong to drop it, right?
I think the original USNIC protocol is layered directly over Ethernet.
On 4/27/2015 6:24 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:53 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
On 4/27/2015 5:36 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:16 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
On 4/27/2015 2:52 PM, ira.weiny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:39:05AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
O
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:53 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 4/27/2015 5:36 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:16 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
> >> On 4/27/2015 2:52 PM, ira.weiny wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:39:05AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 04/24/2015 05:12 PM, Li
On 4/27/2015 5:36 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:16 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
On 4/27/2015 2:52 PM, ira.weiny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:39:05AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
On 04/24/2015 05:12 PM, Liran Liss wrote:
[snip]
Like:
enum rdma_protocol {
RDMA_PROTO
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 17:16 -0700, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 4/27/2015 2:52 PM, ira.weiny wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:39:05AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04/24/2015 05:12 PM, Liran Liss wrote:
> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
>
> >>> [sn
On 4/27/2015 2:52 PM, ira.weiny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:39:05AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
On 04/24/2015 05:12 PM, Liran Liss wrote:
From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
[snip]
a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h index
65994a1..d54f91e 100644
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:39:05AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 04/24/2015 05:12 PM, Liran Liss wrote:
> >> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> >>
> > [snip]
> >> a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h index
> >> 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
> >> --- a/incl
On 04/24/2015 05:12 PM, Liran Liss wrote:
>> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
>>
> [snip]
>> a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h index
>> 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
>> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> @@ -75,10 +75,13 @@ enum
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 10:46 -0400, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 4/24/2015 10:35 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/24/2015 04:29 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
> >> On 4/24/2015 8:23 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> > [snip]
> >>> +static enum rdma_transport_type
> >>> +mlx5_ib_query_transport(struct ib_device *d
> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
>
[snip]
> a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h index
> 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> @@ -75,10 +75,13 @@ enum rdma_node_type { };
>
> enum rdma_transport_type
On 4/24/2015 10:35 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
On 04/24/2015 04:29 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
On 4/24/2015 8:23 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
[snip]
+static enum rdma_transport_type
+mlx5_ib_query_transport(struct ib_device *device, u8 port_num)
+{
+return RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB;
+}
+
Just noticed that m
On 04/24/2015 04:29 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 4/24/2015 8:23 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
[snip]
>> +static enum rdma_transport_type
>> +mlx5_ib_query_transport(struct ib_device *device, u8 port_num)
>> +{
>> +return RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB;
>> +}
>> +
>
>
> Just noticed that mlx5 is not being coded
On 4/24/2015 8:23 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
Add new callback query_transport() and implement for each HW.
Mapping List:
node-type link-layer old-transport new-transport
...
mlx4IB_CA IB/ETH IB IB/IBOE
mlx5IB_CA
22 matches
Mail list logo
