On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Wendy Cheng
s.wendy.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
The OFED package itself does include XRC support. The issue here
(my
guess) is that its build script needs to
- Original Message -
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Christoph Lameter c...@gentwo.org
wrote:
Clean reviewed patches for this are where?
They are in OFED-1.5.3.1 so they were already released.
OFED is neither clean nor reviewed. Really. The stuff in OFED
always
needs a
My latest patches are at:
git://git.openfabrics.org/~shefty/rdma-dev.git xrc
So I went through this and merged it to my tree (pretty much only conflicts
from 3.0-3.1-rc fixed, commit log changes and other minor cleanups).
The result is pushed out to my github for-next branch, with the
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Roland Dreier wrote:
My latest patches are at:
git://git.openfabrics.org/~shefty/rdma-dev.git xrc
So I went through this and merged it to my tree (pretty much only conflicts
from 3.0-3.1-rc fixed, commit log changes and other minor cleanups).
We got the XRC
Oh yeah and can we can FDR support in for-next as well?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Christoph Lameter c...@gentwo.org wrote:
There seems to be some stuff missing in the upstream code compared to the
OFED releases:
1. Raw ethernet support (IB_QPT_RAW_ETH) is missing.
2. MLX4_IB_QP_BLOCK_LOOPBACK is broken it seems? All packets are fed back
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Christoph Lameter c...@gentwo.org wrote:
There seems to be some stuff missing in the upstream code compared to the
OFED releases:
1. Raw ethernet support (IB_QPT_RAW_ETH) is missing.
2.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Christoph Lameter c...@gentwo.org wrote:
Clean reviewed patches for this are where?
They are in OFED-1.5.3.1 so they were already released.
OFED is neither clean nor reviewed. Really. The stuff in OFED always
needs a bunch
of review before it is suitable for
The result is pushed out to my github for-next branch, with the
expectation that I'll ask Linus to pull for 3.2.
Thanks - I'll take a look and test again.
However I do have one question: the last patch
(RDMA/uverbs: Export ib_open_qp() capability to user space in
my tree) adds
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Christoph Lameter c...@gentwo.org wrote:
Clean reviewed patches for this are where?
They are in OFED-1.5.3.1 so they were already released.
OFED is neither clean nor reviewed. Really. The stuff in OFED always
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
ib_open_qp() is implemented entirely in the verbs layer (verbs.c). The OFED
API compatibility support that I added to libibverbs makes use of this call,
which I tested by running OSU's mvapich2.
Wait, now I'm baffled
Wait, now I'm baffled by the patch (ie
http://git.openfabrics.org/git?p=~shefty/rdma-
dev.git;a=commitdiff;h=1ec4e62a6e967ddc258e7c4e674168debb727d39)
I don't see anything that calls ib_uverbs_open_qp(). Am I missing something??
Does the OFED API compatibility actually call this function
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
I'm confused now. The patch definitely looks like it's missing a change to
uverbs_main.c to setup the command table. (I thought you were referring to
needing a change to struct ib_device before.)
Right, we need to
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Has XRC support not been merged? How can I build the OFED libraries
against Linux 3.1? I'd really like to get rid of the OFED kernel tree
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Has XRC support not been merged? How can I build the OFED
Why is the OFED libibverbs library binary incompatible with the
non-OFED libibverbs library ? Why hasn't XRC support been implemented
in the OFED libibverbs library such that applications built against
the upstream libibverbs headers also work with the latest OFED version
of that library ?
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Wendy Cheng s.wendy.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
The OFED package itself does include XRC support. The issue here (my
guess) is that its build script needs to understand the running
system's kernel version to decide what should be pulled (from the
source). Linux 3.1
Did we every resolve the controversy about the rcv QPs with
MPI users? The design seemed sane to me, but
Yes - I believe so.
Also (I'm sure you already posted this once, but...) Sean,
do you have a git tree with all the kernel patches included?
My latest patches are at:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
though this is based on 3.0.
Thanks, that's fine. I don't think I merged many changes for 3.1 ;)
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Has XRC support not been merged? How can I build the OFED libraries
against Linux 3.1? I'd really like to get rid of the OFED kernel tree
nightmare.
You have to use upstream libraries with upstream kernels. Be warned
that the
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Has XRC support not been merged? How can I build the OFED libraries
against Linux 3.1? I'd really like to get rid of the OFED kernel tree
nightmare.
You have to use upstream
21 matches
Mail list logo
