On 8/13/2010 10:21 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:14 -0700, Hefty, Sean wrote:
I know there is a bug with ib_send_bw -b (bi-directional)
since it doesn't create a CQ that is large enough for all the
posted sends *and* receives. I have tried several times to get the
PM
To: Ralph Campbell; Hefty, Sean; Ido Shamay; Amir Ancel
Cc: Sumeet Lahorani; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: CQ overrun with ib_send_bw
On 8/13/2010 10:21 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:14 -0700, Hefty, Sean wrote:
I know there is a bug with ib_send_bw -b (bi
Technologies
-Original Message-
From: Tziporet Koren
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 2:19 PM
To: Ralph Campbell; Hefty, Sean; Ido Shamay; Amir Ancel
Cc: Sumeet Lahorani; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: CQ overrun with ib_send_bw
On 8/13/2010 10:21 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
On Fri
-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Raz Baussi
Subject: RE: CQ overrun with ib_send_bw
The patch is attached.
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 04:36 -0700, Amir Ancel wrote:
Hi Sean,
We've seen this issue as well.
Can you send the patch directly to us ?
Added Raz from my team which replaces Ido while he is OOO
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:14 -0700, Hefty, Sean wrote:
I know there is a bug with ib_send_bw -b (bi-directional)
since it doesn't create a CQ that is large enough for all the
posted sends *and* receives. I have tried several times to get the
following patch applied but I never got a reply
