> On the other hand, I never fully understood what does IBV_QPT_RAW_ETY
> stand for? Maybe we should change its name to better represent what the
> code does.
Picking names for things is not my strongest suit, and I don't have a
very good suggestion, so I'll leave that out. But on the point ab
Alex Rosenbaum wrote:
I never fully understood what does IBV_QPT_RAW_ETY stand for? Maybe we should
change its name to better represent what the code does.
before, maybe take a look on the IB spec... see the spec references
mentioned by the patch to support IB_QPT_RAW_ETY which posted to the
l
e 23, 2010 1:21 PM
To: Moni Shoua; linux-rdma
Cc: Roland Dreier; Alex Rosenbaum
Subject: RE: Name for a new type of QP
I would prefer a name IBV_QPT_FRAME so it is a L2 layerQP. The packet is
reserved for L3.
Regards,
Mirek
-Original Message-
From: Moni Shoua [mailto:mo...@voltaire.
I would prefer a name IBV_QPT_FRAME so it is a L2 layerQP. The packet is
reserved for L3.
Regards,
Mirek
-Original Message-
From: Moni Shoua [mailto:mo...@voltaire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:20 AM
To: linux-rdma
Cc: Walukiewicz, Miroslaw; Roland Dreier; al...@voltaire.com
S
