> -Original Message-
> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> Subject: Re: Node Description mismatch between saquery & smpquery
>
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 07:13 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On 6/17/2013 5:38 PM, Albert Chu wrote:
> >
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 07:13 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 6/17/2013 5:38 PM, Albert Chu wrote:
> > We've recently noticed that the Node Description for a node can
> > mis-mismatch between the output of smpquery and saquery. For example:
> >
> > # smpquery NodeDesc 427
> > Node Description:...
On 6/17/2013 5:38 PM, Albert Chu wrote:
> We've recently noticed that the Node Description for a node can
> mis-mismatch between the output of smpquery and saquery. For example:
>
> # smpquery NodeDesc 427
> Node Description:.sierra1932 qib0
>
> # saquery NodeRecord 427 | grep No
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 22:00 +, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> Does running "update_desc" in the console fix this?
This worked as a short term solution. But we're still thinking about a
longer term one that requires less interaction.
Al
> Ira
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: linux-rdma-ow...
Does running "update_desc" in the console fix this?
Ira
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Albert Chu
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:38 PM
> To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Node Description mis
