Re: mlx4: propagate node_description changes down to FW

2010-10-04 Thread Or Gerlitz
Jack Morgenstein wrote: I have not yet submitted the patch to the list. sounds like its about time to do that... could you send this to review/merge into 2.6.37? From what was commented here and further looking, the sentence "[...] Upon receiving this trap, OpenSM initiates a heavy sweep, th

Re: mlx4: propagate node_description changes down to FW

2010-10-03 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Gerlitz [mailto:ogerl...@voltaire.com] > Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 5:31 PM > To: Jack Morgenstein; linux-rdma > Subject: re: mlx4: propagate node_description changes down to FW > > Hi Jack, > > I just came across this patch of yours which was placed in ofed 1.5.2, I > didn&#x

RE: mlx4: propagate node_description changes down to FW

2010-10-03 Thread Jack Morgenstein
: Sunday, October 03, 2010 5:31 PM To: Jack Morgenstein; linux-rdma Subject: re: mlx4: propagate node_description changes down to FW Hi Jack, I just came across this patch of yours which was placed in ofed 1.5.2, I didn't see any track of it here @ linux-rdma (any specific reason for

re: mlx4: propagate node_description changes down to FW

2010-10-03 Thread Or Gerlitz
Hi Jack, I just came across this patch of yours which was placed in ofed 1.5.2, I didn't see any track of it here @ linux-rdma (any specific reason for that?) - some questions/issues to discuss - 1st and most, (say) for 1k node cluster, is it correct that for each node doing start/restart of