Hi all,
I have a question about a completion for a send with immediate data. The IB
spec (1.2.1) only mentions that the WC's immediate data be present at the
receiver. It is silent on the value on the sender at completion. It does say
that it is only valid if the WC's immediate data indicator i
> I have a question about a completion for a send with immediate data. The IB
> spec (1.2.1) only mentions that the WC's immediate data be present at the
> receiver. It is silent on the value on the sender at completion. It does say
> that it is only valid if the WC's immediate data indicator is se
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> I have a question about a completion for a send with immediate data. The IB
>> spec (1.2.1) only mentions that the WC's immediate data be present at the
>> receiver. It is silent on the value on the sender at completion. It does say
>> that it is
On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> I have a question about a completion for a send with immediate data. The IB
>> spec (1.2.1) only mentions that the WC's immediate data be present at the
>> receiver. It is silent on the value on the sender at completion. It does say
>> that it is
On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Atchley, Scott wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>
>>> I have a question about a completion for a send with immediate data. The IB
>>> spec (1.2.1) only mentions that the WC's immediate data be present at the
>>> receiver. It is silent on the va
> Any thoughts?
>
> Personally, I would like to have it in the send completion, but it might not
> be possible for all drivers to implement. If not, then the spec should be
> clarified.
>From my interpretation of the spec, it looks like a bug and the immediate data
>should be available in the se
> From my interpretation of the spec, it looks like a bug and the immediate data
> should be available in the send wc, since it's not explicitly excluded. I'll
> verify that this is the intent with the IBTA.
I'm still waiting on feedback from the IBTA, but they are looking into the
matter.
> I
> I'm still waiting on feedback from the IBTA, but they are looking into the
> matter.
The intent is for immediate data only to be provided on receive work
completions. The IBTA will clarify the spec on this. I'll submit patches that
remove setting the wc flag, which may help avoid this confus
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> The intent is for immediate data only to be provided on receive work
> completions. The IBTA will clarify the spec on this. I'll submit patches
> that remove setting the wc flag, which may help avoid this confusion some.
The unfortunate th
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 03:35:58PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > The intent is for immediate data only to be provided on receive
> > work completions. ?The IBTA will clarify the spec on this. ?I'll
> > submit patches that remove setting the w
On Jan 11, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>> I'm still waiting on feedback from the IBTA, but they are looking into the
>> matter.
>
> The intent is for immediate data only to be provided on receive work
> completions. The IBTA will clarify the spec on this. I'll submit patches
> that r
11 matches
Mail list logo
