Hi Or,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:01:58AM -0600, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:49:25PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Shawn Bohrer sboh...@rgmadvisors.com wrote:
Is there any estimate on when we might see something like this upstream?
Could you elaborate a little on your use
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:49:25PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Shawn Bohrer sboh...@rgmadvisors.com wrote:
Is there any estimate on when we might see something like this upstream?
Could you elaborate a little on your use case for multicast IBoE
traffic? e.g how the setup looks like and how are
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:17:02PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
Roland Dreier rol...@purestorage.com wrote:
looks like the libmlx4 patches I applied from you are missing multicast AH
support?
Yes, when I reworked the patches for submission I went from easier
(RC) to harder (ucast UD + Vlans)
Shawn Bohrer sboh...@rgmadvisors.com wrote:
Is there any estimate on when we might see something like this upstream?
Could you elaborate a little on your use case for multicast IBoE
traffic? e.g how the setup looks like and how are your Ethernet
switches act to route that traffic.
Or.
--
To
Roland Dreier rol...@purestorage.com wrote:
looks like the libmlx4 patches I applied from you are missing multicast AH
support?
Yes, when I reworked the patches for submission I went from easier
(RC) to harder (ucast UD + Vlans) and eventually didn't nailed down
the multicast front. I probably
Roland Dreier rol...@purestorage.com wrote:
looks like the libmlx4 patches I applied from you are missing multicast AH
support?
On a related note, what/when would it take to get a release of
libibverbs/libmlx4? so far there's no single release that supports
IBoE and people who don't go OFED
it is very unclear to me what the development work flow is
between the OFED and upstream versions of these libraries. Is there a
plan to add multicast IBoE support to the upstream versions?
Thanks,
Shawn
---
This email, along with any
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Shawn Bohrer sboh...@rgmadvisors.com wrote:
$ mckey -m 239.1.1.1 -b 10.0.202.3
mckey: starting server
mckey: joining
mckey: joined dgid: ff0e:::ef01:101 mlid 0x0 sl 0
mckey: failure creating address handle
test complete
return status 0
Debugging this I
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:44:01PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Shawn Bohrer sboh...@rgmadvisors.com wrote:
$ mckey -m 239.1.1.1 -b 10.0.202.3
mckey: starting server
mckey: joining
mckey: joined dgid: ff0e:::ef01:101 mlid 0x0 sl 0
mckey: failure
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
I thought that was deliberate because of the lack of specification and
the strange reliance on IPv6 MLD for IBoE packet types...
AFAIK none of that has changed?
I honestly can't remember the discussion.
10 matches
Mail list logo