RE: [PATCH v5 1/2] can: rcar_canfd: Add Renesas R-Car CAN FD driver

2016-05-03 Thread Ramesh Shanmugasundaram
Hi Rob, > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:23:07PM +0100, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram wrote: > > This patch adds support for the CAN FD controller found in Renesas > > R-Car SoCs. The controller operates in CAN FD only mode by default. > > > > CAN FD mode supports both Classical CAN & CAN FD frame formats.

Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] serial: sh-sci: Update DT binding documentation for dedicated RTS/CTS

2016-05-03 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:58:25PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Some Renesas SCIF UARTs have dedicated lines for RTS/CTS hardware flow > control. Whether these lines exist depends on SoC and UART instance > inside the SoC. Whether these lines can be used for hardware flow > control depends

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Increase the size of GIC-400 mapped registers

2016-05-03 Thread Dirk Behme
Hi Simon, On 29.04.2016 12:35, Marc Zyngier wrote: On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:43:45 +1000 Simon Horman wrote: [Cc Mark Zyngier, linux-arm-kernel] Hi Dirk, On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:41:57AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote: Hi Simon, On 28.04.2016 01:30, Simon Horman wrote: Hi Dirk, I understand tha

Re: [PATCH] thermal: rcar_thermal: Fix priv->zone error handling

2016-05-03 Thread Dirk Behme
On 21.04.2016 15:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: In case thermal_zone_xxx_register() returns an error, priv->zone isn't NULL any more, but contains the error code. This is passed to thermal_zone_device_unregister(), then. This checks for priv->

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] can: rcar_canfd: Add Renesas R-Car CAN FD driver

2016-05-03 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:23:07PM +0100, Ramesh Shanmugasundaram wrote: > This patch adds support for the CAN FD controller found in Renesas R-Car > SoCs. The controller operates in CAN FD only mode by default. > > CAN FD mode supports both Classical CAN & CAN FD frame formats. The > controller s

Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ravb: Remove rx buffer ALIGN

2016-05-03 Thread David Miller
From: Yoshihiro Kaneko Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 00:19:51 +0900 > From: Kazuya Mizuguchi > > Aligning the reception data size is not required. > > Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko > Tested-by: Simon Horman Applied, thanks.

Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: dts: r8a7793: Add MMCIF0

2016-05-03 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Ulrich Hecht wrote: > Same as on r8a7791. > > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht > --- > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi > @@ -543,6 +543,19 @@ > status = "disabled"; > }; > > + mmcif0: mmcif@ee200

[PATCH v4] ARM: dts: r8a7793: Add MMCIF0

2016-05-03 Thread Ulrich Hecht
Same as on r8a7791. Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht --- This revision updates the power-domains node. CU Uli Changes since v3: - set power-domains = <&sysc R8A7793_PD_ALWAYS_ON> Changes since v2: - change back to one DMA controller - use GIC_SPI - add max-frequency arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dt

Re: [RFC 0/4] mmc: tmio/sdhi: prevent regressions when setting clock

2016-05-03 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 2 May 2016 at 22:25, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Here is a small refactoring series for setting the clock for SDHI cores. This > is to prevent regression on platforms where this feature has not been tested. > One such regression is known on r8a7740 (patches 2+3). Patch 4 fixes an > oversight and patc

Re: [RFC 0/4] mmc: tmio/sdhi: prevent regressions when setting clock

2016-05-03 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Wolfram, On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Here is a small refactoring series for setting the clock for SDHI cores. This > is to prevent regression on platforms where this feature has not been tested. > One such regression is known on r8a7740 (patches 2+3). Patch 4 fixes a