Hi Marek,
Thank you for the patch.
On Saturday 01 Jul 2017 22:04:51 Marek Vasut wrote:
> In case the initial values of the FOD registers are not configured in
> the OTP or by the bootloader, it is possible that the FOD registers
> will contain zeroes. The code in vc5_fod_recalc_rate() immediately
Hi Marek,
Thank you for the patch.
On Saturday 01 Jul 2017 22:04:52 Marek Vasut wrote:
> Fix trivial typo in vc5_clk_out_unprepare() , s/Enable/Disable/ .
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Cc: Stephen Boyd
> Cc: Alexey Firago
> Cc: Michael Turquette
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart
> Cc: linux-renesas
On 07/02/2017 10:19 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Saturday 01 Jul 2017 22:04:51 Marek Vasut wrote:
>> In case the initial values of the FOD registers are not configured in
>> the OTP or by the bootloader, it is possible that the FOD registers
>> will
Hello Dirk,
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 07:48:41AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> > On my machine (Udoo Neo, A9 + M4) the A9 is the primary CPU that is
> > started by the bootrom. If I want the M4 being the primary device I'd
> > need support in the bootloader to wait long enough (i.e. until the M4 is
> >
On some R-Car SoCs a single VSP can serve multiple DU channels through
multiple LIF instances in the VSP. The current DT bindings don't support
specifying that kind of SoC integration scheme. Extend them with a VSP
channel index.
Backward compatibility can be ensured in drivers by checking the len
Hi Morimoto-san,
On Friday 30 Jun 2017 08:32:04 Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Kieran
>
> > -static void rcar_du_vsp_complete(void *private)
> > +static void rcar_du_vsp_complete(void *private, bool completed)
> > {
> > struct rcar_du_crtc *crtc = private;
> >
> > - rcar_du_crtc_finish_pag
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Florian Fainelli
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/18/2017 01:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Andrew Lunn wro
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:59:52PM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> of_device_ids are not supposed to change at runtime. All functions
> working with of_device_ids provided by work with const
> of_device_ids. So mark the non-const structs as const.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav
Applied with acks
