Re: [tty:tty-next 23/34] include/linux/kconfig.h:5:10: fatal error: generated/autoconf.h: No such file or directory

2017-12-17 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 3:00 AM, kbuild test robot wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git > tty-next > head: 38d5583ff8900c543322a74471b436d1b8b4018a > commit: f6731485a51978ca0931c787fcb8a0bc4dcc9303 [23/34] tty: serial: sh-sci: > Hide number of ports

Re: [tty:tty-next 23/34] include/linux/kconfig.h:5:10: fatal error: generated/autoconf.h: No such file or directory

2017-12-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 11:15:37AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 3:00 AM, kbuild test robot > wrote: > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git > > tty-next > > head: 38d5583ff8900c543322a74471b436d1b8b4018a > > commit: f6731485a51978

Re: [PATCH 4/5] v4l2: async: Postpone subdev_notifier registration

2017-12-17 Thread Kieran Bingham
Hi Jacopo, Thank you for the patch, This seems like a good thing to do at a glance here, but I'll leave contextual judgement like that to Sakari. A few minor grammatical nits here and a question on locking. On 13/12/17 18:26, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > Currently, subdevice notifiers are tested again

Re: [PATCH 4/5] v4l2: async: Postpone subdev_notifier registration

2017-12-17 Thread Kieran Bingham
On 17/12/17 13:10, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > Thank you for the patch, > > This seems like a good thing to do at a glance here, but I'll leave contextual > judgement like that to Sakari. Oh - I hit send and *then* my mail client wakes up and tells me Sakari reviewed two days ago. --

Re: [PATCH 4/5] v4l2: async: Postpone subdev_notifier registration

2017-12-17 Thread jacopo mondi
Hi Sakari, On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:20:40PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:26:19PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > Currently, subdevice notifiers are tested against all available > > subdevices as soon as they get registered. It often happens anyway > > tha

Re: [PATCH 5/5] v4l2: async: Add debug output to v4l2-async module

2017-12-17 Thread jacopo mondi
Hi Sakari, On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 06:17:04PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:26:20PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > The v4l2-async module operations are quite complex to follow, due to the > > asynchronous nature of subdevices and notifiers registration and

Re: [PATCH 1/5] v4l: async: Use endpoint node, not device node, for fwnode match

2017-12-17 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sakari, Thank you for the patch. On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 20:26:16 EET Jacopo Mondi wrote: > From: Sakari Ailus > > V4L2 async framework can use both device's fwnode and endpoints's fwnode > for matching the async sub-device with the sub-device. In order to proceed > moving towards end

Re: [PATCH 2/5] device property: Add fwnode_get_name() operation

2017-12-17 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jacopo, Thank you for the patch. On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 20:26:17 EET Jacopo Mondi wrote: > Add operation to retrieve the device name from a fwnode handle. > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi > --- > drivers/acpi/property.c | 6 ++ > drivers/base/property.c | 12 > dr

Re: [PATCH 3/5] include: v4l2_async: Add 'owner' field to notifier

2017-12-17 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, On Friday, 15 December 2017 16:38:16 EET Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:26:18PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > Notifiers can be registered as root notifiers (identified by a 'struct > > v4l2_device *') or subdevice notifiers (identified by a 'struct > > v4l

Re: [PATCH 4/5] v4l2: async: Postpone subdev_notifier registration

2017-12-17 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Jacopo, Thank you for the patch. On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 20:26:19 EET Jacopo Mondi wrote: > Currently, subdevice notifiers are tested against all available > subdevices as soon as they get registered. It often happens anyway > that the subdevice they are connected to is not yet initiali

Re: [PATCH 5/5] v4l2: async: Add debug output to v4l2-async module

2017-12-17 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hello, On Friday, 15 December 2017 18:17:04 EET Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:26:20PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > The v4l2-async module operations are quite complex to follow, due to the > > asynchronous nature of subdevices and notifiers registration and > > matching procedu

Re: [PATCH] bus: simple-pm-bus: convert bool SIMPLE_PM_BUS to tristate

2017-12-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, December 1, 2017 8:02:33 AM CET Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:57:00PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > From: Paul Gortmaker > > > > The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: > > > > config SIMPLE_PM_BUS > > bool "Simple Power-Managed

Re: [PATCH 4/5] v4l2: async: Postpone subdev_notifier registration

2017-12-17 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Laurent, On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 07:03:17PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 20:26:19 EET Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > Currently, subdevice notifiers are tested against all available > > subdevices as soon as they get regis

Re: [PATCH 5/5] v4l2: async: Add debug output to v4l2-async module

2017-12-17 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Jacopo, On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 05:42:54PM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 06:17:04PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Jacopo, > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:26:20PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > > > The v4l2-async module operations are quite complex to

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm: rcar-du: calculate DPLLCR to be more small jitter

2017-12-17 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Geert > >> > From: Kuninori Morimoto > >> > In general, PLL has VCO (= Voltage controlled oscillator), > >> > one of the very important electronic feature called as "jitter" > >> > is related to this VCO. > >> > In academic generalism, VCO should be maximum to be more small jitter. > >> > In

[RFC PATCH] mmc: tmio: use ioread* for repeated access to a register

2017-12-17 Thread Wolfram Sang
Not all archs define reads* and writes*. Switch to ioread*_rep and friends which is defined everywhere, so we can enable COMPILE_TEST after that. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- So, I pushed this to buildbot on top of Yamada-san's patch series and there were no complaints, even with COMPILE_TEST

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add sound support

2017-12-17 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Biju > This series aims to add sound support for iWave RZ/G1M board. > > This patch series has below dependencies > 1) https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg622754.html > 2) https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10108041/ > > Biju Das (5): > ARM: dts: iwg20d-q7-common: Sound PIO support

[PATCH v4 0/2] drm: rcar-du: calculate DPLLCR to be more small jitter

2017-12-17 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Laurent, David These are v4 of DPLLCR patch for rcar-du. Mainly fixuped 2000 -> 2kHz to unambiguous Kuninori Morimoto (2): drm: rcar-du: use 1000 to avoid misunderstanding in rcar_du_dpll_divider() drm: rcar-du: calculate DPLLCR to be more small jitter drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_cr

[PATCH v4 1/2] drm: rcar-du: use 1000 to avoid misunderstanding in rcar_du_dpll_divider()

2017-12-17 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
From: Kuninori Morimoto It is difficult to understand its scale if number has many 0s. This patch uses "* 1000" to avoid it in rcar_du_dpll_divider(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- v3 -> v4 - no change drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 d

[PATCH v4 2/2] drm: rcar-du: calculate DPLLCR to be more small jitter

2017-12-17 Thread Kuninori Morimoto
From: Kuninori Morimoto In general, PLL has VCO (= Voltage controlled oscillator), one of the very important electronic feature called as "jitter" is related to this VCO. In academic generalism, VCO should be maximum to be more small jitter. In high frequency clock, jitter will be large impact.

Re: [RFC PATCH] mmc: tmio: use ioread* for repeated access to a register

2017-12-17 Thread Ian Molton
On 18/12/17 00:00, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Not all archs define reads* and writes*. Switch to ioread*_rep and > friends which is defined everywhere, so we can enable COMPILE_TEST after > that. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > --- > > So, I pushed this to buildbot on top of Yamada-san's patch seri

[renesas-drivers:topic/renesas-overlays 23/108] drivers/of/dynamic.c:1076 of_changeset_add_property_stringf() error: potential null dereference 'str'. (kvasprintf returns null)

2017-12-17 Thread kbuild test robot
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git topic/renesas-overlays head: c991b7bbdc862ab5c1a7edf88d04105fa081e2fc commit: e068b1eab7180587d15bbc55abdc5851b7f216dc [23/108] of: changesets: Introduce changeset helper methods smatch warnings: show-warning-co

RE: [PATCH v2 6/6] phy: renesas: rcar-gen3-usb2: add gpio handling

2017-12-17 Thread Yoshihiro Shimoda
Hi Rob, Thank you for your comments! > -Original Message- > From: Rob Herring, Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2017 3:05 AM > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > Some R-Car SoCs (e.g. R-Car D3) doesn't have dedicated pins of VBUS > > and ID. So, they may b