Re: [PATCH] can: rcar_canfd: Correct order of interrupt specifiers

2016-12-01 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 11/23/2016 02:44 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > According to both DTS (example and actual files), and Linux driver code, > the first interrupt specifier should be the Channel interrupt, while the > second interrupt specifier should be the Global interrupt. > > Signed-off-by: Geert

Re: [PATCH] can: rcar_canfd: Correct order of interrupt specifiers

2016-11-30 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 02:44:46PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > According to both DTS (example and actual files), and Linux driver code, > the first interrupt specifier should be the Channel interrupt, while the > second interrupt specifier should be the Global interrupt. > > Signed-off-by:

RE: [PATCH] can: rcar_canfd: Correct order of interrupt specifiers

2016-11-23 Thread Ramesh Shanmugasundaram
Hi Geert, > Subject: [PATCH] can: rcar_canfd: Correct order of interrupt specifiers > > According to both DTS (example and actual files), and Linux driver code, > the first interrupt specifier should be the Channel interrupt, while the > second interrupt specifier should be the G

[PATCH] can: rcar_canfd: Correct order of interrupt specifiers

2016-11-23 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
According to both DTS (example and actual files), and Linux driver code, the first interrupt specifier should be the Channel interrupt, while the second interrupt specifier should be the Global interrupt. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven ---