Hi Simon,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:56:22AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:46:31AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Simon Horman
>> > wrote:
>> > > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:56:22AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:46:31AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Simon Horman
> > wrote:
> > > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
> > >
> > > This is part of
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:46:31AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Simon Horman
> wrote:
> > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
> >
> > This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
> > ARCH_RENESAS the motiv
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Simon Horman
wrote:
> Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
>
> This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
> ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more
> appropriate name than SHMOBI
Hi Simon,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday 24 February 2016 11:22:22 Simon Horman wrote:
> Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
>
> This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
> ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a mor
Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more
appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horma
