Re: [PATCH 2/7] i2c: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

2017-06-19 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:30:45AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > It is 'R-Car', not 'RCar'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Applied to for-next, thanks! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH 2/7] i2c: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

2017-05-29 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > It is 'R-Car', not 'RCar'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux b

[PATCH 2/7] i2c: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

2017-05-28 Thread Wolfram Sang
It is 'R-Car', not 'RCar'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- I suggest this trivial patch should be picked individually per susbsystem. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/