On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 10:43:24PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> The "compatible" property description contradicts even the example given:
> it only says that there must be a single value while the example has the
> fallback value too -- which makes much more sense. Moreover, the generic
>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 10:43:24PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> The "compatible" property description contradicts even the example given:
> it only says that there must be a single value while the example has the
> fallback value too -- which makes much more sense. Moreover, the generic
>
The "compatible" property description contradicts even the example given:
it only says that there must be a single value while the example has the
fallback value too -- which makes much more sense. Moreover, the generic
property value is misdocumented as being R-Car (and RZ/G1) specific...
Fixes:
