Hi,
> From: Mathias Nyman
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 8:42 PM
>
> >>> isn't the following enough?
> >>>
> >>> @@ -4886,7 +4886,7 @@ int xhci_gen_setup(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
> >>> xhci_get_quirks_t get_quirks)
> >>> xhci->hcc_params2 = readl(&xhci->cap_regs->hcc_params2);
>
isn't the following enough?
@@ -4886,7 +4886,7 @@ int xhci_gen_setup(struct usb_hcd *hcd, xhci_get_quirks_t
get_quirks)
xhci->hcc_params2 = readl(&xhci->cap_regs->hcc_params2);
xhci_print_registers(xhci);
- xhci->quirks = quirks;
+ xhci->quirks |= quirks;
Hi,
Yoshihiro Shimoda writes:
>> From: Felipe Balbi
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 4:01 PM
>>
>> Yoshihiro Shimoda writes:
>>
>> > I'm afraid but I found a regression of xhci-rcar in v4.7-rc1.
>> > This regression is caused by the following commit:
>> >
>> > commit b1c127ae990bccf0187d741c
Hi Felipe,
> From: Felipe Balbi
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 4:01 PM
>
> Yoshihiro Shimoda writes:
>
> > I'm afraid but I found a regression of xhci-rcar in v4.7-rc1.
> > This regression is caused by the following commit:
> >
> > commit b1c127ae990bccf0187d741c1695a61e54de1943
> > Author: F
Yoshihiro Shimoda writes:
> I'm afraid but I found a regression of xhci-rcar in v4.7-rc1.
> This regression is caused by the following commit:
>
> commit b1c127ae990bccf0187d741c1695a61e54de1943
> Author: Felipe Balbi
> Date: Fri Apr 22 13:17:16 2016 +0300
>
> usb: host: xhci: plat: make u
I'm afraid but I found a regression of xhci-rcar in v4.7-rc1.
This regression is caused by the following commit:
commit b1c127ae990bccf0187d741c1695a61e54de1943
Author: Felipe Balbi
Date: Fri Apr 22 13:17:16 2016 +0300
usb: host: xhci: plat: make use of new methods in xhci_plat_priv