From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Since commit ab82fa7da4dce5c7 ("gpio: rcar: Prevent module clock disable
when wake-up is enabled"), when a GPIO is used for wakeup, the GPIO block's
module clock (if exists) is manually kept running during system suspend, to
make sure the device stays active.
However, th
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
>
> Since commit ab82fa7da4dce5c7 ("gpio: rcar: Prevent module clock disable
> when wake-up is enabled"), when a GPIO is used for wakeup, the GPIO block's
> module clock (if exists) is manually kept running during sys
Hi Linus,
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
>> Since commit ab82fa7da4dce5c7 ("gpio: rcar: Prevent module clock disable
>> when wake-up is enabled"), when a GPIO is used for wakeup, the GPIO bl
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
>>> Since commit ab82fa7da4dce5c7 ("gpio: rcar: Prevent module clock disable
>>
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
>
> Since commit ab82fa7da4dce5c7 ("gpio: rcar: Prevent module clock disable
> when wake-up is enabled"), when a GPIO is used for wakeup, the GPIO block's
> module clock (if exists) is manually kept running during syst
Hi Rafael,
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
>>
>> Since commit ab82fa7da4dce5c7 ("gpio: rcar: Prevent module clock disable
>> when wake-up is enabled"), when a GPIO is used for wakeup, the
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
>>>
>>> Since commit ab82fa7da4dce5c7 ("gpio: rcar: Prevent module clock disa
On 2 January 2018 at 11:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Sinc
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
>>> [Ulf: Converted to use the WAKEUP_PATH driver PM flag]
>
> Ulf: + killing the DEV_PM_OPS define, increasing kernel size if PM_SUSPEND=n?
Oh, yes - correct!
The code looks nicer, with the penalty of one static struct declared
and not used, in case CONFIG_
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 2 January 2018 at 11:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson
Hi Ulf,
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
[Ulf: Converted to use the WAKEUP_PATH driver PM flag]
>>
>> Ulf: + killing the DEV_PM_OPS define, increasing kernel size if PM_SUSPEND=n?
>
> Oh, yes - correct!
>
> The code looks nicer, with
On 2 January 2018 at 14:53, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 2 January 2018 at 11:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
wr
12 matches
Mail list logo