On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 02:30:09AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 17:13:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 15:58:25 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:33:57PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday 04 Jan
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 17:13:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 15:58:25 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:33:57PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 14:51:48 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> Hm, something like drm_bridge_panel_
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 15:58:25 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:33:57PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 14:51:48 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> Hm, something like drm_bridge_panel_bridge_init(dev, panel) should be
> >> enough, or not? My idea i
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 04:33:57PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 14:51:48 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Hm, something like drm_bridge_panel_bridge_init(dev, panel) should be
> > enough, or not? My idea is to use this for the case where the only
> > thing in dt is the panel, w
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 14:51:48 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 09:18:18 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:57:07PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 10:54:09 Daniel
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 09:18:18 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:57:07PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 10:54:09 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:04:36AM +0
Hi Daniel,
On Wednesday 04 Jan 2017 09:18:18 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:57:07PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 10:54:09 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:04:36AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> The LVDS encoder driver is a D
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:57:07PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 10:54:09 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:04:36AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > The LVDS encoder driver is a DRM bridge driver that supports the
> > > parallel to LVD
Hi Daniel,
On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 22:57:07 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 10:54:09 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:04:36AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> The LVDS encoder driver is a DRM bridge driver that supports the
> >> parallel to LVDS encoders that
Hi Daniel,
On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 10:54:09 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:04:36AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The LVDS encoder driver is a DRM bridge driver that supports the
> > parallel to LVDS encoders that don't require any configuration. The
> > driver thus doesn't i
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:04:36AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The LVDS encoder driver is a DRM bridge driver that supports the
> parallel to LVDS encoders that don't require any configuration. The
> driver thus doesn't interact with the device, but creates an LVDS
> connector for the panel an
The LVDS encoder driver is a DRM bridge driver that supports the
parallel to LVDS encoders that don't require any configuration. The
driver thus doesn't interact with the device, but creates an LVDS
connector for the panel and exposes its size and timing based on
information retrieved from DT.
Sig
12 matches
Mail list logo