Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] iommu: Add MMIO mapping type

2016-02-16 Thread Niklas Söderlund
* Robin Murphy [2016-02-16 12:43:40 +]: > On 16/02/16 12:06, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > >Hi Robin, > > > >Thanks for your update patch I will include it in my next version. But > >I'm sorry I do not understand, is your modification an addition or a > >substitution to

Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] iommu: Add MMIO mapping type

2016-02-16 Thread Robin Murphy
On 16/02/16 12:06, Niklas Söderlund wrote: Hi Robin, Thanks for your update patch I will include it in my next version. But I'm sorry I do not understand, is your modification an addition or a substitution to your original patch? Apologies for being confusing - that was a diff on top of the

Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] iommu: Add MMIO mapping type

2016-02-16 Thread Niklas Söderlund
Hi Robin, Thanks for your update patch I will include it in my next version. But I'm sorry I do not understand, is your modification an addition or a substitution to your original patch? * Robin Murphy [2016-02-11 15:57:26 +]: > On 11/02/16 00:02, Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] iommu: Add MMIO mapping type

2016-02-11 Thread Robin Murphy
On 11/02/16 00:02, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi Niklas, Thank you for the patch. On Wednesday 10 February 2016 01:57:51 Niklas Söderlund wrote: From: Robin Murphy On some platforms, MMIO regions might need slightly different treatment compared to mapping regular memory;

[PATCH v3 1/8] iommu: Add MMIO mapping type

2016-02-09 Thread Niklas Söderlund
From: Robin Murphy On some platforms, MMIO regions might need slightly different treatment compared to mapping regular memory; add the notion of MMIO mappings to the IOMMU API's memory type flags, so that callers can let the IOMMU drivers know to do the right thing.