On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:55:27AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 1 September 2016 at 10:37, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:46:44AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> > On 30 August 2016 at
On 1 September 2016 at 10:37, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:46:44AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> > On 30 August 2016 at 22:51, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Aug 29,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:46:44AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On 30 August 2016 at 22:51, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:05:55PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > >> On 29 August 2016 at
On 30 August 2016 at 22:51, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:05:55PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 29 August 2016 at 14:05, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:01:35AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> >> On 25 August 2016 at
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:05:55PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 29 August 2016 at 14:05, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:01:35AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >> On 25 August 2016 at 14:04, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016
On 29 August 2016 at 14:05, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:01:35AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 25 August 2016 at 14:04, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> >> >> I am
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:01:35AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 25 August 2016 at 14:04, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
...
> >> >> I am wondering whether it would it be possible to keep a cache of the
> >> >> currently
On 25 August 2016 at 14:04, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> >> > +static int tmio_mmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>> >>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> > +static int tmio_mmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> >> > +{
> >> > + struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> >> > + unsigned int num;
> >> > + int i, ret = 0;
> >> > +
On 27 July 2016 at 06:13, Simon Horman wrote:
> From: Ai Kyuse
>
> Add tuning support for use with SDR104 mode
>
> Signed-off-by: Ai Kyuse
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
> ---
> v4 [Simon
> +static int tmio_mmc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> +{
> + struct tmio_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> + unsigned int num;
> + int i, ret = 0;
> + bool *tap;
> +
> + if (!host->init_tuning || !host->select_tuning)
Check host->prepare_tuning, too?
> +
From: Ai Kyuse
Add tuning support for use with SDR104 mode
Signed-off-by: Ai Kyuse
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
v4 [Simon Horman]
As suggested by Wolfram Sang:
- Do not perform tuning if host->select_tuning is
12 matches
Mail list logo