On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 03:57:07PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> @@ -697,6 +700,8 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void)
> >> break;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + is_sun8i = sunxi_mc_smp_data[i].is_sun8i;
> >> +
> >
> > Do we really need to cache it? Can't we just have
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:50:29PM +0200, Mylène Josserand wrote:
>> To prepare the support of sun8i-a83t, add a field in the smp_data
>> structure to know if we are on sun9i-a80 or sun8i-a83t.
>>
>> Add also a global variable to retr
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:50:29PM +0200, Mylène Josserand wrote:
> To prepare the support of sun8i-a83t, add a field in the smp_data
> structure to know if we are on sun9i-a80 or sun8i-a83t.
>
> Add also a global variable to retrieve which architecture we are
> having.
>
> Signed-off-by: My
To prepare the support of sun8i-a83t, add a field in the smp_data
structure to know if we are on sun9i-a80 or sun8i-a83t.
Add also a global variable to retrieve which architecture we are
having.
Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand
---
arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insert
