> void watchdog_set_nowayout(struct watchdog_device *wdd, struct driver
> *drv, bool nowayout)
>
> I'd think this would work from a layering perspective.
No, this is also bogus. probe() works per device, and
.suppress_bind_attrs works per driver. We need to tackle this
Hi Guenter,
> > - if (nowayout)
> > + if (nowayout) {
> > set_bit(WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT, >status);
> > + wdd->parent->driver->suppress_bind_attrs = true;
>
> That makes sense to me. We can not assume that wdd->parent is set, so it
> won't work as-is.
Good point!
> Not sure
On 08/28/2018 03:29 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
With NOWAYOUT, prevent bind/unbind possibilities in SYSFS.
Proof-of-concept, not for upstream yet.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
So, this is really an RFC to check if something like this is considered useful
or not. If so, we probably need to do
With NOWAYOUT, prevent bind/unbind possibilities in SYSFS.
Proof-of-concept, not for upstream yet.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
---
So, this is really an RFC to check if something like this is considered useful
or not. If so, we probably need to do it differently because modifying the
parent's
