Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] watchdog: renesas_wdt: use standard clock handling

2017-08-14 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:47:28PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:32:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:54:36PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > As mentioned in a response to a previous patch, clock handling for Renesas > > > R-Car is done via

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] watchdog: renesas_wdt: use standard clock handling

2017-08-14 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:32:30AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:54:36PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > As mentioned in a response to a previous patch, clock handling for Renesas > > R-Car is done via RuntimePM. Patch 1 implements that consequently. Patch 2 > > is a

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] watchdog: renesas_wdt: use standard clock handling

2017-08-14 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:54:36PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > As mentioned in a response to a previous patch, clock handling for Renesas > R-Car is done via RuntimePM. Patch 1 implements that consequently. Patch 2 > is a cleanup then possible and patch 3 is a trivial copyright update. > > This

[RFC PATCH 0/3] watchdog: renesas_wdt: use standard clock handling

2017-07-26 Thread Wolfram Sang
As mentioned in a response to a previous patch, clock handling for Renesas R-Car is done via RuntimePM. Patch 1 implements that consequently. Patch 2 is a cleanup then possible and patch 3 is a trivial copyright update. This is RFC because I'd like Geert's comments on these patches first which