Hi Dirk-san,
> From: Dirk Behme, Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:08 PM
>
> Limiting the thread to Renesas only, again, to discuss the other issue:
>
> On 17.10.2017 06:51, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > Hi Linus-san,
> >
> >> From: Linus Walleij, Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:22 PM
> >>
> >>
Limiting the thread to Renesas only, again, to discuss the other issue:
On 17.10.2017 06:51, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
Hi Linus-san,
From: Linus Walleij, Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:22 PM
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16,
Hi Linus-san,
> From: Linus Walleij, Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:22 PM
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Linus Walleij
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
IIUC,
- Since the MMC_BOUNCE
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>>> IIUC,
>>> - Since the MMC_BOUNCE disappeared in v4.14-rc1, the MMC core will request
>>> a command with 64kbyte+
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>> IIUC,
>> - Since the MMC_BOUNCE disappeared in v4.14-rc1, the MMC core will request a
>> command with 64kbyte+ size.
>> - So, swiotlb will got request 64kbyte+ size. This is different with
>> previous
CC LinusW, Ulf, linux-mmc
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda
wrote:
>> From: Dirk Behme, Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 6:13 PM
>> On 12.10.2017 10:20, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> > On 11.10.2017 15:20, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 11,
Hi Dirk-san,
> From: Dirk Behme, Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 6:13 PM
>
> On 12.10.2017 10:20, Dirk Behme wrote:
> > On 11.10.2017 15:20, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Hi Dirk,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Dirk Behme
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 11.10.2017
On 12.10.2017 10:20, Dirk Behme wrote:
On 11.10.2017 15:20, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Dirk Behme
wrote:
On 11.10.2017 14:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Dirk Behme
Hi Dirk,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 11.10.2017 14:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Dirk Behme
>> wrote:
>>> trying to boot recent mainline v4.14-rc4 on a custom H3 ES2.0 board with
Hi Geert,
On 11.10.2017 14:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
trying to boot recent mainline v4.14-rc4 on a custom H3 ES2.0 board with
rootfs on SD card I'm getting [1].
Last time I think I used v4.13 in the
Hi Dirk,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> trying to boot recent mainline v4.14-rc4 on a custom H3 ES2.0 board with
> rootfs on SD card I'm getting [1].
>
> Last time I think I used v4.13 in the same environment and I think it worked
> fine, most
Hi,
trying to boot recent mainline v4.14-rc4 on a custom H3 ES2.0 board with
rootfs on SD card I'm getting [1].
Last time I think I used v4.13 in the same environment and I think it
worked fine, most probably because renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac wasn't
there, yet ;)
I checked
13 matches
Mail list logo