Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. > Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB. > So each section's maximum size should be 16MB. Could you explain what's the problem? Even though

Re: [PATCH v2] SDHCI-S3C fixes and enhancements (driver specific code)

Hi Andrew, I hope to merge it at next merge windows. Others any comments? Thank you, Kyungmin Park On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hello, > > This series includes various fixes to sdhci-s3c driver as well as a > major feature enhancement. This patch series is prepare

[PATCH] ARM: S5PV210: Fix on SECTION_SIZE_BITS on S5PV210/S5PC110.

This patch fixes on SECTION_SIZE_BITS for Sparsemem on S5PV210/S5PC110. Because smallest size of a bank on S5PV210/S5PC110 is aligned by 16MB. So each section's maximum size should be 16MB. Reported-by: Kyongho Cho Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/include/mach/memory.h |8

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Kyungmin Park wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> > Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: >> >> >> >>  Op 05-07-10 03:46, Joonyoung Shim schreef: >> >> > This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they > register

RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

Joonyoung Shim wrote: > > On 7/5/2010 9:44 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Joonyoung Shim wrote: > >> This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they register > >> their PMU IRQs with the PMU framework in the Kernel. > >> > > Please include Ben Dooks email address in the CC. > > OK. > >

RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

Joonyoung Shim wrote: > > On 7/5/2010 9:57 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: > >> Op 05-07-10 03:46, Joonyoung Shim schreef: > >>> This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they register > >>> their PMU IRQs with the PMU framework in the Kernel. > >>> > >>> Signed

RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

Kyungmin Park wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: > >> > >>  Op 05-07-10 03:46, Joonyoung Shim schreef: > >> > This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they register > >> > their PMU IRQs with the PMU framework in the Kernel.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

On 7/5/2010 9:44 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Joonyoung Shim wrote: >> This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they register >> their PMU IRQs with the PMU framework in the Kernel. >> > Please include Ben Dooks email address in the CC. OK. > >> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim >> ---

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

On 7/5/2010 9:57 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: >> Op 05-07-10 03:46, Joonyoung Shim schreef: >>> This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they register >>> their PMU IRQs with the PMU framework in the Kernel. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim >>> --- >>> a

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: >> >>  Op 05-07-10 03:46, Joonyoung Shim schreef: >> > This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they register >> > their PMU IRQs with the PMU framework in the Kernel. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Joonyoung S

Re: [PATCH] ARM: SAMSUNG: updates sdhci.h for Samsung SoCs

Hi, Instead of refactoring, how about to delete it and move to dev-hsmmc file. We don't need to call each sdhci_setup at each cpu files. just set platform data and register platform data. Just focus the each dev-hsmmc file and no need to change header file anymore. How do you think? Thank you,

RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: > > Op 05-07-10 03:46, Joonyoung Shim schreef: > > This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they register > > their PMU IRQs with the PMU framework in the Kernel. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-s5p6442/include/mach/irqs.

RE: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

Joonyoung Shim wrote: > > This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they register > their PMU IRQs with the PMU framework in the Kernel. > Please include Ben Dooks email address in the CC. > Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim > --- > arch/arm/mach-s5p6442/include/mach/irqs.h |2

[PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: S5PV210: Add support HSMMC on SMDKV210

From: Hyuk Lee This patch adds support HSMMC on SMDKV210, and gpio configuration for S5PV210 hsmmc3. Signed-off-by: Hyuk Lee Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig |5 + arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/cpu.c|1 + arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/includ

[PATCH] ARM: SAMSUNG: updates sdhci.h for Samsung SoCs

This patch updates sdhci.h as Maurus suggestion like following: From: #ifdef ... function() { blahblah; } #else function() { } #endif To: function() { #ifdef ... blahblah; #endi

[PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: Add device definition for HSMMC3

From: Hyuk Lee This patch adds hsmmc3 device definition in plat-samsung. Because now S5PV210 can support 4 hsmmc such as hsmmc0, hsmmc1, hsmmc2 and hsmmc3 and that can be used in further Samsung SoCs. Signed-off-by: Hyuk Lee Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim --- arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig

[PATCH v3] Add support HSMMC on Samsung SMDKV210

This patch adds support hsmmc on SMDKV210. Changes since v2: - Moved some codes for support hsmmc3 on smdkv210 to second patch Changes since v1: - Fixed wrong pin name in comments - Adding missed call s5pv210_default_sdhci3() in s5pv210_map_io() - Minor coding style fixes [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: S

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Add PMU device

Op 05-07-10 03:46, Joonyoung Shim schreef: > This patch adds an initcall for the s5p platforms so that they register > their PMU IRQs with the PMU framework in the Kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim > --- > arch/arm/mach-s5p6442/include/mach/irqs.h |2 +- > arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/inclu

[PATCH 3/3] arm: s5pv210: GONI: add support for MAX8998 PMIC

This patch adds required platform definitions for MAX8998 PMIC driver. Power regulators for LDO and BUCK outputs has been defined as well as a simple gpio-keys button for power key (to enable wakeup functionality with external interrupt). Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Pa

[PATCH 1/3] arm: s5pv210: GONI: add support for framebuffer

This patch adds required platform definitions to enable s3c-fb driver on GONI board. One framebuffer window in 480x800x16bpp mode is defined. Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig |2 + arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c | 39 +++

[PATCH 2/3] arm: s5pv210: Aquila: add support for MAX8998 PMIC

This patch adds required platform definitions for MAX8998 PMIC driver. Power regulators for LDO and BUCK outputs has been defined as well as a simple gpio-keys button for power key (to enable wakeup functionality with external interrupt). Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Pa

[PATCH v2] Samsung Aquila & GONI update

Hello, This short patch series adds basic framebuffer defintion to Samsung GONI board as well as PMIC8998 support for both Samsung Aquila and GONI boards. MAX8998 PMIC driver has been accepted by regulator subsystem maintainers and is already available in the 'next' kernel tree (see commit 8d017ab

RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] sdhci-s3c: Add SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_WP_BIT quirk

Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hello, > Hello :-) > On Saturday, July 03, 2010 3:01 AM Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > From: Hyuk Lee > > > > If host controller doesn't have WP pin which should be connnected with > > SDMMC > > card WP pin, can implement get_ro function with using the allocated gpio. > >

RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] sdhci-s3c: Add SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_WP_BIT quirk

Hello, On Saturday, July 03, 2010 3:01 AM Kukjin Kim wrote: > From: Hyuk Lee > > If host controller doesn't have WP pin which should be connnected with > SDMMC > card WP pin, can implement get_ro function with using the allocated gpio. > In order to use this quirk wp_gpio in the platform data m