Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>
> Hi, Dmitry.
>
> On 7/9/2010 4:39 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> > On 7/9/2010 4:07 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> >>> On 7/7/2010 8:52 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> > Hi, Naveen.
> >
> > On 6/28/2010 8:33 PM, Joonyoung
Hi, Dmitry.
On 7/9/2010 4:39 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> On 7/9/2010 4:07 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>>> On 7/7/2010 8:52 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> Hi, Naveen.
>
> On 6/28/2010 8:33 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> This patch adds support fo
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> From: Changhwan Youn
>
> This patch adds Samsung S5PV310/S5PC210 CPU support.
> The S5PV310/S5PC210 integrates a ARM Cortex A9 multi-core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn
> Signed-off-by: Jongpill Lee
> Signed-off-by: Jiseong Oh
> Signed-o
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 07/19/10 06:31, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>
>> Previously, most of CLK_DIV/SRC register accessing mask and shift
>> values were used at arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c only; thus we
>> had not been using macros for these. However, as CPUFREQ uses
>>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 07/19/10 06:31, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>
>> CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide
>> such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently
>> between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel
>>
On 07/19/10 06:31, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Previously, most of CLK_DIV/SRC register accessing mask and shift
values were used at arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/clock.c only; thus we
had not been using macros for these. However, as CPUFREQ uses
those shift and mask values as well, we'd better define them at a
On 07/19/10 06:31, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide
such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently
between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel
assumes that the CPU is EVT1, users may use code for EVT0 later.
On 07/19/10 06:31, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
Early S5PC110 (EVT0) chip had some issues required workaround from a
kernel. We can add such workaround codes with this Kconfig entry.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig |7 +++
1 files chan
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 07/19/10 06:31, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>
>> Early S5PC110 (EVT0) chip had some issues required workaround from a
>> kernel. We can add such workaround codes with this Kconfig entry.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Pa
Kyungmin Park wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > From: Changhwan Youn
> >
> > This patch adds timer support for S5PV310.
> > Until now, all S5P SoCs use CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET macro as
> a default
> > configuration. Instead, S5PV310 implements clocksource a
From: Changhwan Youn
This patch adds Samsung S5PV310/S5PC210 CPU support.
The S5PV310/S5PC210 integrates a ARM Cortex A9 multi-core.
Signed-off-by: Changhwan Youn
Signed-off-by: Jongpill Lee
Signed-off-by: Jiseong Oh
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
---
Changes since v2:
- Re-model platsmp.c on the
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:07:07AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> From: MyungJoo Ham
>
> Two issues are addressed for max8998_set_voltage function.
Acked-by: Mark Brown
but as IIRC I said last time it would be nicer to fix one issue per
patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>
>> S5PV210 CPUFREQ Support.
>>
>> This CPUFREQ may work without PMIC's DVS support. However, it is not
>> as effective without DVS support as supposed. AVS is not supported in
>> this version.
>>
>> Note that CLK_SRC of so
13 matches
Mail list logo
