On Wednesday 20 April 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:30 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Sounds good. I think we should put it into a new drivers/iommu, along
> > with your specific iommu implementation, and then we can convert the
> > existing ones over to use that.
>
>
Hello,
On Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:30 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > That is a limitation of the current implementation. We might want to
> > > change that anyway, e.g. to handle the mali IOMMU along with yours.
> > > I believe the reason for allowing only one IOMMU type so far has been
> > > tha
Hi Kgene,
At 10:46 19/04/2011 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
As a note, I'm doing(or preparing) following at the moment.
- Removing some "mach-s5p"s
Are you planning to remove mach-s5pc100? If yes, is this with the
intention of reducing arch/arm code size (by merging, say, with the
s5pc110 tre
