On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 12:06 -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 05/25/11 11:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 10:28 -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >> On 05/20/11 06:46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> > So that address has changed between two SoC revisions? That's
> > unfortunate, to say
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:45:37PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> I2C here is a SMDK specific requirement and even if most devices need I2C,
>> selecting I2C for every EXYNOS4210 based device is not ideal. IMO it'd better
>> be tied to some SMDK
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:45:37PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
> I2C here is a SMDK specific requirement and even if most devices need I2C,
> selecting I2C for every EXYNOS4210 based device is not ideal. IMO it'd better
> be tied to some SMDK specific config option.
Given that it's the audio machine
