Re: [PATCH] ARM: SAMSUNG: Modify the devname for pl330 clock

2011-08-16 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
Hi, looks like it contains my series as a subset. -- With best wishes, Vladimir On 17.08.2011 03:26, Boojin Kim wrote: This patch modified the devname for pl330 clock from 's3c-pl330' to 'dma-pl330' to support new pl330 driver on dmaengine. NOTE: This patch sould be added after merging new pl3

Re: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: register the second instance of PL330 DMAC

2011-08-16 Thread ALIM AKHTAR
Yes, mdma need to be provided. Exynos4 has two DMA tops: one for M2M and another for peripheral-to-memory. Peripheral-to-memory consists of two PL330s (pdam0 and pdma1), current mainline code supports this. --- Original Message --- Sender : Kyungmin Park Date : Aug 17, 2011 14:37 (GMT+09:

Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: register the second instance of PL330 DMAC

2011-08-16 Thread Kyungmin Park
Does it also need to provide the mdma? On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:06 PM, alim akhtar wrote: > From: Alim Akhtar > > Two instance of platform data is provided for PL330 but only one PL330 DMAC > instance is registered with amba_device. > These patch sets registers the second instance with amba_dev

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: S5PC100: register the second instance of pl330 DMAC

2011-08-16 Thread alim akhtar
From: Alim Akhtar Platform data is provided for two instance of pl330 DMAC, but only one DMAC is register with amba_device. This patch register the second instance. Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar --- arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/dma.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 2/3] ARM: S5PV210: register the second instance of pl330 DMAC

2011-08-16 Thread alim akhtar
From: Alim Akhtar Platform data is provided for two instance of pl330 DMAC, but only one DMAC is register with amba_device. This patch register the second instance. Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar --- arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/dma.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 0/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: register the second instance of PL330 DMAC

2011-08-16 Thread alim akhtar
From: Alim Akhtar Two instance of platform data is provided for PL330 but only one PL330 DMAC instance is registered with amba_device. These patch sets registers the second instance with amba_device. These patches are based on kgene's tree next/topic-dma-pl330 branch. http://git.kernel.org/?p=l

[PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: register the second instance of pl330 DMAC

2011-08-16 Thread alim akhtar
From: Alim Akhtar Platform data is provided for two instance of pl330 DMAC, but only one DMAC is register with amba_device. This patch register the second instance. Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/dma.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

RE: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: use dma-pl330 device name for clock

2011-08-16 Thread Boojin Kim
Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:31 AM > To: Kukjin Kim > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradead.org; Vladimir Zapolskiy; Boojin Kim > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: use dma-pl330 device name for clock > > This change replaces s3

[PATCH] ARM: SAMSUNG: Modify the devname for pl330 clock

2011-08-16 Thread Boojin Kim
This patch modified the devname for pl330 clock from 's3c-pl330' to 'dma-pl330' to support new pl330 driver on dmaengine. NOTE: This patch sould be added after merging new pl330 driver on dmaengine. Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/clock.c |4 ++-- arch/arm/mach-s5

[PATCH 0/3] ARM: Samsung: use dma-pl330 device name for clock

2011-08-16 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
This changeset replaces s3c-pl330.x clock device names with dma-pl330.x, otherwise there won't be a correspondence between clock device name and amba device name, thus clocks can't be enabled. Fixes runtime errors on clk_get() from drivers/dma/pl330.c: dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Cannot get operation

[PATCH 2/3] ARM: S5PC100: use dma-pl330 device name for clock

2011-08-16 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
This change replaces s3c-pl330.x clock device names with dma-pl330.x, otherwise there won't be a correspondence between clock device name and amba device name, thus clocks can't be enabled. Fixes runtime errors on clk_get() from drivers/dma/pl330.c: dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Cannot get operation cl

[PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: use dma-pl330 device name for clock

2011-08-16 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
This change replaces s3c-pl330.x clock device names with dma-pl330.x, otherwise there won't be a correspondence between clock device name and amba device name, thus clocks can't be enabled. Fixes runtime errors on clk_get() from drivers/dma/pl330.c: dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Cannot get operation cl

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: S5PV210: use dma-pl330 device name for clock

2011-08-16 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
This change replaces s3c-pl330.x clock device names with dma-pl330.x, otherwise there won't be a correspondence between clock device name and amba device name, thus clocks can't be enabled. Fixes runtime errors on clk_get() from drivers/dma/pl330.c: dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Cannot get operation cl

Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS4: Configure MAX8997 PMIC for Origen

2011-08-16 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 04:38:46PM +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: > On 14 August 2011 20:31, Mark Brown > wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:26:05AM +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote: > > > +static struct regulator_consumer_supply __initdata ldo7_consumer[] = { > > > + REGULATOR_SUPPLY("avdd", "so

[PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: Remove un-used code

2011-08-16 Thread Banajit Goswami
Remove un-used backlight code for SMDK6410 board Signed-off-by: Banajit Goswami --- arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c | 39 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-

RE: [PATCH V5 00/15] To use DMA generic APIs for Samsung DMA

2011-08-16 Thread Koul, Vinod
On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 13:11 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Koul, Vinod wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 16:26 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > Koul, Vinod wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:53 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Boojin Kim > > wrote: