On 5 December 2011 11:46, Subhash Jadavani wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Girish K S [mailto:girish.shivananja...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 5:08 PM
>> To: Subhash Jadavani
>> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; patc...@linaro.org; linux-samsung-
>> s...@vger.kern
Hi Girish,
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Girish K S
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 8:42 PM
> To: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: c...@laptop.org; kgene@samsung.com; patc...@linaro.org; linux-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Girish K S [mailto:girish.shivananja...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 5:08 PM
> To: Subhash Jadavani
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; patc...@linaro.org; linux-samsung-
> s...@vger.kernel.org; Chris Ball
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] mmc: core: HS2
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> > MyungJoo Hamm wrote:
>> >>
>> > What's the 'compiler errors'?
>> >
>> > And I don't know why this patch included in this series, maybe this
>> should
>> > be separa
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:15:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, December 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It might make sense for it to go via the Samsung tree - the third patch
> > depends on it and there's some other stuff going on with the s3c64xx
> > power management - so let's
On Monday, December 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:56:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 01, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
>
> > Looks good with the new version of [2/3].
>
> > Do you want me to takt it?
>
> It m
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:56:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 01, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown
> Looks good with the new version of [2/3].
> Do you want me to takt it?
It might make sense for it to go via the Samsung tree - the third patch
On Thursday, December 01, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> Since systems are likely to have power domains that can't be turned off
> for various reasons at least temporarily while implementing power domain
> support provide a default governor which will always refuse to power off
> the domain, saving plat
On Sunday, December 04, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 11:31:07PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 03, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > The first patch in the series added the replacement as generic code,
> > > this patch is deleting the shmobile specific