On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
+ release_resource(hsudc-mem_rsrc);
+ kfree(hsudc-mem_rsrc);
release_mem_region() is paired with request_mem_region. Do not go beneath
the API by doing the above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:28:34PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Instead of adding and deleting the gadget device in the start and stop
invocations. Use device_register in the probe method to initialize
and add the gadget device and unregister it in the remove function.
This also requires a
Am Sonntag 18 Dezember 2011, 09:10:48 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
As the driver is also buildable as a module it should need
a cleanup function for the removal of the module.
My guess is that this wasn't implemented
Am Sonntag 18 Dezember 2011, 09:10:48 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
As the driver is also buildable as a module it should need
a cleanup function for the removal of the module.
My guess is that this wasn't implemented
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:44:39PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Sonntag 18 Dezember 2011, 09:10:48 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
As the driver is also buildable as a module it should need
a cleanup function for the
On 12/16/11 17:24, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Hi Mr. Kim,
It's maybe missing for v3.3 merge at samsung soc.
Please give your opinion, how to handle it?
Looks ok to me at the moment, and as a note, I'm sorting it out now.
If you don't mind it, it can merge it by devfreq.
Hmm, I think, it should
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:04:18AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Hmm, I cannot find the iommu/exynos branch what you said in your iommu
tree yet. Maybe you missed or any problem?
Problems. I tried to apply the patches and there were conflicts. After
solving them I wasn't able to find a
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 07:50:37PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
I didn't get this far. With your patch the Oopses already happen during
the startup of the system / the loading of the modules.
A bit of the message spew I got during testing with linux-next-20111216:
In some way, this is a good
Am Sonntag 18 Dezember 2011, 20:45:18 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 08:33:32PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Sonntag 18 Dezember 2011, 20:01:02 schrieben Sie:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 07:50:37PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
I didn't get this far. With your
Am Sonntag 18 Dezember 2011, 21:39:53 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 09:24:12PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Sonntag 18 Dezember 2011, 20:45:18 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 08:33:32PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Sonntag 18
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 09:46:08PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
kobject: 'holders' (c7addc80): kobject_cleanup
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address bf055504
pgd = c0004000
[bf055504] *pgd=371f9811, *pte=, *ppte=
Internal error: Oops: 7 [#1]
Changes in v6:
split the patch into 2 and classified them as a patch for device
and host. Modified to include the review comments.
Changes in v5:
Reduced the case statements for better code readability. Removed
unused macro definitions. Modified the tuning
12 matches
Mail list logo
