On 26 March 2012 21:06, Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
On 26 March 2012 18:34, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
Your fix doesn't really guarantee the proper order either. It's still a
side effect of the implementation. Perhaps a retry mechanism would work.
Then the
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:50:24AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote:
I created topic branch for this we talked. You can pull that following:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
On 25 March 2012 01:29, Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: Samsung: Rework platform data of s3c-fb driver
For all the Samsung SoC based boards which have the platform data for
s3c-fb driver, the 'default_win' element in the platform data is removed
On 25 March 2012 01:29, Thomas Abraham thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: s3c64xx: Decouple lcd type from display
controller window data
The display controller window data should contain window configuration data
for only one type of lcd panel. So, for real6410
Upon wake-up, clear the sleep mode set in INFORM1 register.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh inderpal.si...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
index
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:46:43PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
For s3c64xx and exynos platforms, make the selection of PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
depend on the CONFIG_PM.
What's the underlying issue here? This seems like something the PM core
should be dealing with gracefully...
signature.asc
Fixes following compilation error.
drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c: At top level:
drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c:671:3: error: request for member ‘data’ in something not
a structure or union
drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c:674:3: error: request for member ‘data’ in something not
a structure or union
The patches are based on Kukjin's for-next branch and they fix a couple
of compile-time errors and warnings.
The patches have been only build-tested.
Tushar Behera (2):
rtc: rtc-s3c: Fix compilation error
rtc: rtc-s3c: Add placeholder for driver private data
drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 31
On 28 March 2012 16:21, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:46:43PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
For s3c64xx and exynos platforms, make the selection of PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
depend on the CONFIG_PM.
What's the underlying issue here? This seems like
Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2012, 12:50:35 schrieb Tushar Behera:
The patches are based on Kukjin's for-next branch and they fix a couple
of compile-time errors and warnings.
There was also a fixup patch for these problems posted on 2012-01-04. But it
seems
to have been forgotten somehow.
I think
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:51:32PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 28 March 2012 16:21, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
wrote:
What's the underlying issue here? This seems like something the PM core
should be dealing with gracefully...
The PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS config option
On 28 March 2012 17:04, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:51:32PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 28 March 2012 16:21, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
wrote:
What's the underlying issue here? This seems like something the PM
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 05:07:03PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 28 March 2012 17:04, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
wrote:
Right, this does seem like something which it'd be better to handle
more gracefully in the PM core.
Ok. Selecting PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS without
On 03/28/2012 04:58 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2012, 12:50:35 schrieb Tushar Behera:
The patches are based on Kukjin's for-next branch and they fix a couple
of compile-time errors and warnings.
There was also a fixup patch for these problems posted on 2012-01-04. But it
This patch fixes missing mach-s3c24xx/common.h which has been
lost when regarding s3c24xx directories merged.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common.h | 23 +++
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
This fixes the CPUFREQ dependency for regarding EXYNOS SoCs
such as EXYNOS4210, EXYNOS4X12 and EXYNOS5250. Its cpufreq
driver should be built with selection of SoC arch part.
Reported-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
---
Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Anyway Joerg, how do you want to handle this? Do you want to pick up
1/2/3 all of them in your tree? If so, 2nd patch should be on top of
some samsung topic stuff.
Since patch 2 only applies to the Samsung tree,
Thomas Abraham wrote:
The config option MACH_SMDK5250 is not available for Exynos5 since only
a device tree based machine is supported and selected by MACH_EXYNOS5_DT.
Hence, the detection of the cpu type based on machine_is_smdk5250 always
fails and boot hangs due to incorrect uart base being
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Anyway Joerg, how do you want to handle this? Do you want to pick up
1/2/3 all of them in your tree? If so, 2nd patch should be on top of
Thomas Abraham wrote:
Use the of_irq_init() call to setup the gic which also properly registers
the gic device node pointer with gic irq domain, without which all interrupt
specifier translations for gic fail.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abrahamthomas...@samsung.com
---
Thomas Abraham wrote:
Add PDMA and MDMA physical base address macros which is require for Exynos5
of_dev_auxdata setup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abrahamthomas...@samsung.com
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h |5 +
arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c |3 ++-
2
Santosh Y wrote:
+ case READ_12:
+ case WRITE_12:
Just a minor change, this will be READ_16 and WRITE_16.
Thanks. Your feedback will be correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to
Thomas Abraham wrote:
2012/3/22 Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com:
On 03/21/12 03:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello,
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 10:14 AM Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 14 March 2012 20:12, Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.comwrote:
Actually, the base address of uart is different
On 03/28/12 02:54, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:50:24AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote:
I created topic branch for this we talked. You can pull that following:
This patch provides the suspend/resume support for EXYNOS4412.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh inderpal.si...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/regs-pmu.h | 10 +-
arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c|2 +-
arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c | 24
On 28 March 2012 16:39, Subhash Jadavani subha...@codeaurora.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linux-mmc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-mmc-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Saugata Das
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 6:35 PM
To: Girish K S
Cc:
26 matches
Mail list logo
