s3c24xx_register_clock(struct clk *clk) always returns 0, so checking
its return value has no meaning.
There are a few other functions which also return the error code of
s3c24xx_register_clock.
Forcing all these functions to return void would help us save some
line of code.
Signed-off-by: Tusha
DMA clients pdma0 and pdma1 are internal to the SoC and are used only
by dedicated peripherals. Since they cannot be used for generic
purpose, their capability should be set as DMA_PRIVATE.
CC: Vinod Koul
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera
---
drivers/dma/pl330.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertio
DMA clients pdma0 and pdma1 are internal to the SoC and are used only
by dedicated peripherals. Since they cannot be used for generic
purpose, their capability should be set as DMA_PRIVATE.
CC: Kukjin Kim
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2
DMA clients pdma0 and pdma1 are internal to the SoC and are used only
by dedicated peripherals. Since they cannot be used for generic
purpose, their capability should be set as DMA_PRIVATE.
The patches are rebased on top of v3.6-rc3.
Tushar Behera (2):
ARM: EXYNOS: Set the capability of pdm0 an
> -Original Message-
> From: Sachin Kamat [mailto:sachin.ka...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:39 PM
> To: Chanho Park
> Cc: kgene@samsung.com; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-...@vger.kernel.org; li...@arm.linux.org.uk;
> will.dea...@arm.com; th
Hi Chanho,
On 29 August 2012 06:44, Chanho Park wrote:
> This patch define irq numbers of ARM performance monitoring unit for exynos4.
> The number of CPU cores and PMU irq numbers are vary according to soc types.
> So we need to identify each soc type using soc_is_xxx function and define the
> p
This patch enables arm-pmu to bind device tree for exynos5250. The exynos5250
has two pmus which have combiner irq type.
Signed-off-by: Chanho Park
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi |6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/e
This patch define irq numbers of ARM performance monitoring unit for exynos4.
The number of CPU cores and PMU irq numbers are vary according to soc types.
So we need to identify each soc type using soc_is_xxx function and define the
pmu irqs dynamically. In case of exynos4412, there are 4 cpu cores
This patch corrects combined IRQs for exynos4412 platform. The exynos4412 has
four extra combined irq group. Each irq is mapped to IRQ_SPI(xx). Unfortunately,
extra combined IRQs isn't sequential. So, we need to map the irq manually.
Signed-off-by: Chanho Park
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
a
This patch adds set_irq_affinity function for combiner_irq. We need this
function to enable a arm-pmu because the pmu of exynos has combined type irqs.
Signed-off-by: Chanho Park
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 30 +-
1 file changed
This patchset fixes irq numbers of ARM Performance Monitoring unit and enable it
for Perf(Performance Counter) on the exynos 4 and 5. The exynos4 and 5 use 2
more cpu cores which has its own pmu.
The exynos uses combiner-irq type for arm-pmu. Especially, the exynos4412 has 4
extra combined irq grou
On 8/29/12, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 08/28/12 04:08, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Using secure MDMA1 on TrustZone-enabled boards causes early boot crash,
>> so use non-secure instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c | 2 +-
On 8/29/12, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 08/28/12 03:06, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> The GPEx gpios are specific to Exynos4210 and do not exist on Exynos4x12.
>> Redefine them to use the exact SoC name.
>>
>> Based on "ARM: EXYYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx" by
>> Joonyoung Shim, see:
>> ht
On 08/28/12 04:08, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Using secure MDMA1 on TrustZone-enabled boards causes early boot crash,
so use non-secure instead.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 3 ++-
On 08/28/12 03:06, Tomasz Figa wrote:
The GPEx gpios are specific to Exynos4210 and do not exist on Exynos4x12.
Redefine them to use the exact SoC name.
Based on "ARM: EXYYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx" by
Joonyoung Shim, see:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-ker
On 08/23/12 08:20, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:45:19PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Yeah, actually SoC defconfig in mainline doesn't cover _real_ requirements
for (mass) product. But I think, it's time we need to sort out the
defconfigs so that we could use them efficiently on prod
On 08/28/12 01:07, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Changed Exynos4 -> Exynos5.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
index b5b4c8c..9369ff7 10064
On 08/28/12 01:15, Thomas Abraham wrote:
On 24 August 2012 20:22, Chander Kashyap wrote:
The clocks for NAND, OneNAND and Transport Stream Interface(TSI)
controllers could be either enabled or disabled at boot. To ensure
that these are turned off until used, add them to the list of clocks
to be
On 08/27/12 17:13, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki
wrote:
This short patch series converts remaining users of the s3c24xx SoC
specific gpiolib functions to the gpiolib API and finally removes
all s3c2410_* functions from drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c.
On 08/28/12 13:58, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 08/28/2012 12:58 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 08/27/12 13:12, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Add missing get_rate callback for the "camif-upll" clock, so frequency
of this clock is properly reported with clk_get_rate().
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki
-
On 08/28/12 14:55, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Until now the Exynos-SoC was the only Samsung-SoC supporting the GPIOs
via the device tree. This patch implements dt-support for the
s3c24xx arches.
The controllers contain only 3 cells, as the underlying gpio controller
does not support controlling the dr
Until now the Exynos-SoC was the only Samsung-SoC supporting the GPIOs
via the device tree. This patch implements dt-support for the
s3c24xx arches.
The controllers contain only 3 cells, as the underlying gpio controller
does not support controlling the drive strength on a gpio level.
Tested with
On 08/28/2012 12:58 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 08/27/12 13:12, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> Add missing get_rate callback for the "camif-upll" clock, so frequency
>> of this clock is properly reported with clk_get_rate().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock
On 08/28/2012 01:33 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 08/25/12 05:20, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> This short patch series converts remaining users of the s3c24xx SoC
>> specific gpiolib functions to the gpiolib API and finally removes
>> all s3c2410_* functions from drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c.
>>
>> Syl
Hi,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
On Tuesday 28 of August 2012 09:21:40 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 8/28/2012 4:13 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c index 36c3984..1114ced 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> >
Hi,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
On Tuesday 28 of August 2012 20:25:34 Thomas Abraham wrote:
> > + }, {
> > + .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[9],
> > + .irq_base = IRQ_EINT(24),
> > + .chip = {
> > + .base = EXYNOS4_GPX3(0)
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:55:49PM +0900, Sangsu Park wrote:
> All SAMSUNG ASoC needs SND_SOC_SAMSUNG configuration.
> This patch change Kconfig to support all SAMSUNG ASoC.
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to
On 8/28/2012 4:13 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> index 36c3984..1114ced 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,19 @@
>
> extern void exynos4_secondary_startup(voi
On 28 August 2012 15:31, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This patch series makes necessary preparations and adds support for GPIO on
> Exynos4x12 SoCs.
>
> Tomasz Figa (3):
> ARM: EXYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx
> gpio: samsung: Add support for Exynos4x12 SoCs
> ARM: EXYNOS: Add sup
On 28 August 2012 15:36, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Based on patch "gpio/exynos: Add support for Exynos4x12 SoC" by Joonyoung
> Shim.
> See:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/100737.html
>
> Exynos4x12 GPIO part1 and part2 have different layout than Exynos4210,
> so the
On 28 August 2012 15:36, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> The GPEx gpios are specific to Exynos4210 and do not exist on Exynos4x12.
> Redefine them to use the exact SoC name.
>
> Based on "ARM: EXYYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx" by
> Joonyoung Shim, see:
> http://lists.infradead.org/piperma
On 28 August 2012 16:13, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> Hi Seungwon,
>>
>> On 28 August 2012 12:36, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
[...]
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * Exynos4412 and Exynos5250 extends the use of CMD register with
>> >> the
>> >> + * use
On 28 August 2012 16:13, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Sunday, August 26, 2012 Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> Some platforms allow for clock gating and control of bus interface unit clock
>> and card interface unit clock. Add support for clock lookup of optional biu
>> and ciu clocks for clock gating and c
Exynos4412 uses different information register for each core. This patch
adjusts the bring-up code to take that into account.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 25 -
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(
Using secure MDMA1 on TrustZone-enabled boards causes early boot crash,
so use non-secure instead.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 del
On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Hi Seungwon,
>
> On 28 August 2012 12:36, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Thank you for your effort.
> > Some reviews seems like to be omitted. Please check more.
> >
> > On Sunday, August 26, 2012 Thomas Abraham wrote:
> >> Samsun
On Sunday, August 26, 2012 Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Some platforms allow for clock gating and control of bus interface unit clock
> and card interface unit clock. Add support for clock lookup of optional biu
> and ciu clocks for clock gating and clock speed determination.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhila
Hi Karol,
Thanks for your comments.
Please find my response inline.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Karol Lewandowski
wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 08:42 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> On 16 August 2012 18:01, Arun Kumar K wrote:
>
>>> + - interrupts : MFC interupt number to the CPU.
>>> +
>>> + -
Exynos4x12 SoCs use different GPIO pins for FIMC cam port B and this patch
modifies the setup code to take it into account.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimc.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimc.c
b
Based on patch "gpio/exynos: Add support for Exynos4x12 SoC" by Joonyoung Shim.
See: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/100737.html
Exynos4x12 GPIO part1 and part2 have different layout than Exynos4210,
so the initialization code has to be modified to support Exynos4x12
The GPEx gpios are specific to Exynos4210 and do not exist on Exynos4x12.
Redefine them to use the exact SoC name.
Based on "ARM: EXYYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx" by
Joonyoung Shim, see:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/100738.html
Signed-off-by:
This patch series makes necessary preparations and adds support for GPIO on
Exynos4x12 SoCs.
Tomasz Figa (3):
ARM: EXYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx
gpio: samsung: Add support for Exynos4x12 SoCs
ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for FIMC cam port B GPIO setup on Exynos4x12
arch/
On Mon, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:56PM, Sangsu Park wrote:
> All SAMSUNG ASoC needs SND_SOC_SAMSUNG configuration.
> This patch change Kconfig to support all SAMSUNG ASoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sangsu Park
Acked-by: Sangbeom Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-
All SAMSUNG ASoC needs SND_SOC_SAMSUNG configuration.
This patch change Kconfig to support all SAMSUNG ASoC.
Signed-off-by: Sangsu Park
---
sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
in
On 24 August 2012 20:22, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> The clocks for NAND, OneNAND and Transport Stream Interface(TSI)
> controllers could be either enabled or disabled at boot. To ensure
> that these are turned off until used, add them to the list of clocks
> to be turned off during boot.
>
> Signed-
Changed Exynos4 -> Exynos5.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
index b5b4c8c..9369ff7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
+++ b/
Hi Seungwon,
On 28 August 2012 12:36, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thank you for your effort.
> Some reviews seems like to be omitted. Please check more.
>
> On Sunday, August 26, 2012 Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> Samsung Exynos SoC's extend the dw-mshc controller for additional clock and
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for your effort.
Some reviews seems like to be omitted. Please check more.
On Sunday, August 26, 2012 Thomas Abraham wrote:
> Samsung Exynos SoC's extend the dw-mshc controller for additional clock and
> bus
> control. Add support for these extensions and include provide de
48 matches
Mail list logo
