RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Add secure firmware support

2012-11-11 Thread Kukjin Kim
Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Some Exynos-based boards are running with secure firmware running in > TrustZone secure world, which changes the way some things have to be > initialized. > > This series adds support for specifying firmware operations, implements > some firmware operations for Exynos secur

RE: [PATCH 1/4] thermal: Add new thermal trend type to support quick cooling

2012-11-11 Thread R, Durgadoss
> -Original Message- > From: Zhang, Rui > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 12:03 PM > To: R, Durgadoss > Cc: Amit Kachhap; linux...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-samsung- > s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; l...@kernel.org; linux- > a...@vger.kernel.org; jonghwa3@

RE: [PATCH 1/4] thermal: Add new thermal trend type to support quick cooling

2012-11-11 Thread Zhang Rui
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 22:55 -0700, R, Durgadoss wrote: > Hi Amit/Rui, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Amit Kachhap [mailto:amit.kach...@linaro.org] > > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:52 AM > > To: Zhang, Rui > > Cc: linux...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-samsung- > > s...@vger.k

RE: [PATCH 1/4] thermal: Add new thermal trend type to support quick cooling

2012-11-11 Thread R, Durgadoss
Hi Amit/Rui, > -Original Message- > From: Amit Kachhap [mailto:amit.kach...@linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:52 AM > To: Zhang, Rui > Cc: linux...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-samsung- > s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; R, Durgadoss; > l...@kernel.or

Re: [PATCH 1/4] thermal: Add new thermal trend type to support quick cooling

2012-11-11 Thread Zhang Rui
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:51 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote: > On 9 November 2012 09:21, Zhang Rui wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 11:56 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote: > >> On 8 November 2012 11:31, Zhang Rui wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:56 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > >> >> This modifica

RE: [PATCH 2/4] gpio: samsung: Skip registration if pinctrl driver is present on Exynos4x12

2012-11-11 Thread Kukjin Kim
Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > Can you drop above 3 commits in your tree? If many conflicts happens > during > > rebasing, how about that I merge your pinctrl/samsung branch into > Samsung > > tree?... > > Why not :-) > > I have removed the samsung branch from my for-next to avoid > clashes. >

RE: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: S3C64XX: Staticly define parent clock of "camera" clock

2012-11-11 Thread Kukjin Kim
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > On 11/10/2012 10:13 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > On 11/10/2012 03:07 PM, dron0...@gmail.com wrote: > >> From: Andrey Gusakov > >> > >> The "camera" clock have only one parent. Define it staticly and > > Forgot to point out a small typo here: staticly -> statical

RE: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: S3C64XX: Remove duplicated camera clock

2012-11-11 Thread Kukjin Kim
Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > On 11/10/2012 03:07 PM, dron0...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Andrey Gusakov > > > > Camera clock defined two times. One in init_clocks_off array with > > "cam" name, second in clksrcs array with "camera" name. Leave > > second definition because clock have divider. > >

RE: [PATCH v7 0/5] usb: phy: samsung: Introducing usb phy driver for samsung SoCs

2012-11-11 Thread Kukjin Kim
Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > Hi :-) [...] > Sure, but I still need Kukjin's 'say-so' for the arch/arm/plat-samsung > and arch/arm/mach-exynos part. > Basically, this approach looks OK to me. BTW, I have some comments and need to update... >From 4th patch... > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c

Re: [PATCH 2/4] gpio: samsung: Skip registration if pinctrl driver is present on Exynos4x12

2012-11-11 Thread Linus Walleij
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> >> > A commit 1b6056d6 ("pinctrl: samsung: Include bank-specific eint offset >> in >> > bank struct") which is in your pinctrl tree (samsung branch) changed >> > macro(EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG)

Re: S3C244X/S3C64XX SoC camera host interface driver questions

2012-11-11 Thread Andrey Gusakov
Hi. Patch v2 attached. Comments taken into account. >> I often get "VIDIOC_QUERYCAP: failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device" > This is an issue in the v4l2-ctl, it is going to be fixed by adding > VIDIOC_SUBDEV_QUERYCAP ioctl for subdevs. It has been just discussed today. > I guess you get it whe