Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Add DT support for i2s

2012-12-07 Thread Padma Venkat
Hi, On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:11:42 +0900, Mark Brown > wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:40AM +0530, Padma Venkat wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Padmavathi Venna >> > wrote: >> >> > > Padmavathi Venna (2): >> > > ASoC: S

[PATCH 03/25] ASoC: Samsung: remove __dev* attributes

2012-12-07 Thread Bill Pemberton
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option. As result the __dev* markings will be going away. Remove use of __devinit, __devexit_p, __devinitdata, __devinitconst, and __devexit. Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton Cc: Ben Dooks Cc: Kukjin Kim Cc: Sangbeom Kim Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.or

Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] Add DT support for i2s

2012-12-07 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:11:42 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:31:40AM +0530, Padma Venkat wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Padmavathi Venna > > wrote: > > > > Padmavathi Venna (2): > > > ASoC: Samsung: Get I2S src_clk from clock alias id. > > > ASoC: SAMSUNG:

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS5: save CLK_TOP_SRC3 register before powergating

2012-12-07 Thread Prasanna Kumar
Hi Thomas, Thanks for the comments.Please find my reply inline. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > On 27 November 2012 17:52, Prasanna Kumar wrote: > > From: Prasanna Kumar > > > > This patch adds a software workaround to the hardware > > problem found in exynos5 while p

Re: [PATCH] I2C: EXYNOS: Add slave support to i2c

2012-12-07 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:33:17PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > On 12/03/2012 05:46 PM, Giridhar Maruthy wrote: > > This patch adds slave support to i2c. The dt entry i2c-mode > > decides at probe time if the controller needs to work in > > slave mode and the controller is accordingly programmed.

Re: [PATCH] I2C: EXYNOS: Add slave support to i2c

2012-12-07 Thread Tushar Behera
On 12/03/2012 05:46 PM, Giridhar Maruthy wrote: > This patch adds slave support to i2c. The dt entry i2c-mode > decides at probe time if the controller needs to work in > slave mode and the controller is accordingly programmed. > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s

Re: [PATCH] I2C: EXYNOS: Add slave support to i2c

2012-12-07 Thread Giridhar Maruthy
Thanks for the review Subash. Please find my reply below. On 6 December 2012 23:05, Subash Patel wrote: > Hi Giridhar, > > > On 12/03/2012 05:46 PM, Giridhar Maruthy wrote: >> >> This patch adds slave support to i2c. The dt entry i2c-mode >> decides at probe time if the controller needs to work i

Re: [PATCH RESEND V2 1/2] ASoC: Samsung: Do not register samsung audio dma device as pdev

2012-12-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 01:59:21PM +0530, Padmavathi Venna wrote: > Previously, the ASoC 'platform' (PCM/DMA) object was instantiated via a > platform_device. This didn't represent the hardware well, since there > was no separate hardware associated with this platform_device; it was a > virtual dev

[PATCH RESEND V2 2/2] ASoC: SMDK: WM8994: Add device tree support for machine file

2012-12-07 Thread Padmavathi Venna
Add the basic device tree based lookup. Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna --- .../bindings/sound/samsung,smdk-wm8994.txt | 14 ++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 12 + sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c| 26 3

[PATCH RESEND V2 1/2] ASoC: Samsung: Do not register samsung audio dma device as pdev

2012-12-07 Thread Padmavathi Venna
Previously, the ASoC 'platform' (PCM/DMA) object was instantiated via a platform_device. This didn't represent the hardware well, since there was no separate hardware associated with this platform_device; it was a virtual device with sole purpose to call snd_soc_register_platform(). This change re

[PATCH RESEND V2 0/2] ASoC: Samsung: Remove platform device support

2012-12-07 Thread Padmavathi Venna
Changes since V1: - Renamed all samsung based audio platform names with the corresponding cpu dai name - Register the dma device in the corresponding samsung cpu dai driver - Deleted "samsung_asoc_dma" platform device from devs.c - Deleted the "samsung_asoc

[PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: exynos: Add missing static

2012-12-07 Thread Jonghwan Choi
Add missing 'static' qualifiers. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c |2 +- drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c |2 +- drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c |2 +- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5

[PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: exynos: Use APLL_FREQ macro for cpu divider value

2012-12-07 Thread Jonghwan Choi
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/cpufreq.h | 16 ++ drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c| 135 ++ drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c| 378 --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos5250-cpufreq.c| 168 +++- 4

[PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: exynos: Split exynos_target function into two functions

2012-12-07 Thread Jonghwan Choi
Split exynos_target function into exynos_target & exynos_cpufreq_scale. Exynos_cpufreq_scale changes the voltage & frequency. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 151 + 1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) diff -

[PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: exynos: Remove unused variable & IS_ERR

2012-12-07 Thread Jonghwan Choi
The variable 'max_support_idx, min_support_idx, pm_lock_idx" are never used, so remove the unused variable. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/cpufreq.h |3 --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c|3 +-- drivers/cpufreq/exynos4210-cpufreq.c

[PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: exynos: Check old & new frequency early

2012-12-07 Thread Jonghwan Choi
If old & new freq have the same frequency, no need to call cpufreq notifier & regulator function. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ex

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] ASoC: Samsung: Do not register samsung audio dma device as pdev

2012-12-07 Thread Padma Venkat
Hi Mark, On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:20:36AM +0530, Padmavathi Venna wrote: >> Previously, the ASoC 'platform' (PCM/DMA) object was instantiated via a >> platform_device. This didn't represent the hardware well, since there >> was no separate ha