Hi all,
Any comments on this patch ?
Thanks,
Prasanna
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Prasanna Kumar wrote:
> This patch adds device tree nodes for MFC,G-scaler,MAU and ISP power domains
> of exynos5.It binds these power-domain nodes to repsective device tree nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prasanna
On 27 December 2012 09:39, Inderpal Singh wrote:
> i2c->gpios[] is being used to free_gpios but it's not getting initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c |2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
On 27 December 2012 09:39, Inderpal Singh wrote:
> While resuming the gpios are being requested again, hence we need
> to free the gpios before going to suspend otherwise it gives
> "gpio request failed" errors while resuming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2
While resuming the gpios are being requested again, hence we need
to free the gpios before going to suspend otherwise it gives
"gpio request failed" errors while resuming.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/dr
i2c->gpios[] is being used to free_gpios but it's not getting initialized.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c
index a290d08..f1d1f1e 100644
Set the gic arch extension callback to support rtc wakeup.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
index 578a610..bf2ee1d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exyn
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 05:58:32PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> + if (!ret)
> + sphy->phyctrl_pmureg = ioremap(reg[0], reg[1]);
> +
> + of_node_put(usbphy_pmu);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sphy->phyctrl_pmureg)) {
No. Learn what the error return values are from functions.
Hi,
On 12/26/2012 02:56 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Adding support to parse device node data in order to get
required properties to set pmu isolation for usb-phy.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
---
Hope these changes align with what architectura
On 12/24/2012 09:13 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
These two changes look good to me. For both of them:
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson
Well, I have another idea. Yes, I know, specific chip name should be used.
But
you know the specific chip name in compatible can cause another confusion
on other SoC w
On 12/26/2012 01:28 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Adding support to parse device node data in order to get
required properties to set pmu isolation for usb-phy.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
---
.../devicetree/bindings/usb/samsung-usbphy.txt | 31
drivers/usb/phy/samsung-usbphy.c
This patch adds the missing cpufreq_cpu_put function needed for
returning the cpufreq policy instance.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufr
Hello.
On 12/26/2012 09:42 PM, Dongjin Kim wrote:
> This patch support to get interrupt resource from device tree as well as
> platform device if ehci node is defined in device tree and it's irq is
> described.
> Signed-off-by: Dongjin Kim
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-s5p.c |8 +++-
>
This patch support to get interrupt resource from device tree as well as
platform device if ehci node is defined in device tree and it's irq is
described.
Signed-off-by: Dongjin Kim
---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-s5p.c |8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/driv
This patch adds EHCI device node on device tree for Exynos4 and defines its
default platform data, s5p_usb_phy_init and s5p_usb_phy_exit, so that those
function can be called from the driver.
Signed-off-by: Dongjin Kim
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi |7 +++
arch/arm/mach-exyn
This patch set adds device tree upport for USB/EHCI device.
Dongjin Kim (2):
ARM: dts: Add EHCI device tree node for Exynos4
USB: ehci-s5p: Add to get interrupt from DT
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi |7 +++
arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos4-dt.c |9 +
drivers/usb
Hi Sylwester,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Adding support to parse device node data in order to get
> required properties to set pmu isolation for usb-phy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
> ---
Hope these changes align with what architectural changes you had suggested
Adding support to parse device node data in order to get
required properties to set pmu isolation for usb-phy.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
---
.../devicetree/bindings/usb/samsung-usbphy.txt | 31
drivers/usb/phy/samsung-usbphy.c | 145 +---
2 files c
Changes form v3:
- Removing the hostphy_en_mas since this gets used in forthcoming patches
only when host phy support is added.
- Resolving few nits:
- using 'const' specifier for driver data structures.
- using ARRAY_SIZE() instead of giving magic number
for of_prope
Hi Doug,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Vivek,
>
> Nothing really serious below and things look good to me, but figured
> I'd put a few nits in (sorry!).
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Vivek Gautam
> wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/us
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Padma Venkat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Padma Venkat wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Mark Brown
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 01:24:14PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> >> On
On Wednesday 26 December 2012, Barry Song wrote:
> > / {
> > /* ... */
> >
> > firmware@0203F000 {
> > compatible = "samsung,secure-firmware";
> > reg = <0x0203F000 0x1000>;
> > };
> >
> > /* .
2012/11/12, Tomasz Figa :
> Hi Russel,
>
> On Monday 12 of November 2012 09:51:14 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > +
>> > +static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
>> > +{
>> > + exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);
>> > + return 0;
>> > +}
>>
>> Same for this (though, what _exactly_ is 'cpu',
2012/11/22, Tomasz Figa :
> Some Exynos-based boards contain secure firmware and must use firmware
> operations to set up some hardware.
>
> This patch adds firmware operations for Exynos secure firmware and a way
> for board code and device tree to specify that they must be used.
>
> Example of us
2012/11/22, Tomasz Figa :
> Some boards are running with secure firmware running in TrustZone secure
> world, which changes the way some things have to be initialized.
>
> This patch adds an interface for platforms to specify available firmware
> operations and call them.
>
> A wrapper macro, call_
24 matches
Mail list logo
