On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Joonyoung Shim
wrote:
> This adds GPIO interrupt registration and modification needs to register
> GPIO interrupt rightly for exynos5 SoCs. EXYNOS5_GPYx gpios shouldn't be
> counted to GPIO interrupt group register number because they doesn't
> support GPIO inter
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Since EXYNOS5440 can select PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440 without PINCTRL_SAMSUNG,
> it should be fixed. In detail, PINCTRL_SAMSUNG is a kind of frame work
> for supporting pinctrl on most Samsung SoCs including S3C, S5P as well
> except EXYNOS5440 so PIN
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch fixes following warning:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c:450:32: warning: 'exynos_gpio_cfg' defined but
> not used [-Wunused-variable]
> drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c:2450:33: warning: 'exynos5_gpios_1' defined but
> not used [-Wunus
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> From: Thomas Abraham
>
> Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pin-controller module
> EXYNOS5440 SoC.
>
(...)
>
> pinctrl {
> - compatible = "samsung,pinctrl-exynos5440";
> + compatible = "samsung,e
Hi Sachin,
On Thursday 17 of January 2013 11:18:12 Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Added vmmc regulator node in exynos4412-origen.dts file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-origen.dts |9 +
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
Hi Sachin,
On Thursday 17 of January 2013 11:18:13 Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Added sdhci node for exynos4412-origen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-origen.dts |8
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dt
Hi Tomasz
On 17 January 2013 14:56, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Sachin,
>
> On Thursday 17 of January 2013 11:18:12 Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Added vmmc regulator node in exynos4412-origen.dts file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
>> ---
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa
>
Thank you for reviewing the
Hi Olof,
On Saturday 05 of January 2013 14:57:54 Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Kukjin Kim
wrote:
> > Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4
> > SoCs.
> Ah, this answers my question from the previous patch. So, why do 5450
> as a separate patc
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> BTW, do you have any comments on following patches?
>
> [PATCH] gpio: samsung: silent build warning for EXYNOS5
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg14443.html
Merged to fixes.
> [PATCH] gpio: samsung: fix pinctr
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Since exynos5440 can support pinctrl so skip the legacy
> gpiolib registration. If not, happens following.
>
> WARNING: at drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c:3102 samsung_gpiolib_init+0x68/0x8c()
> Unknown SoC in gpio-samsung, no GPIOs added
>
> Acked
Hi Kukjin,
On Wednesday 02 of January 2013 16:20:23 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4 SoCs.
>
> Cc: Thomas Abraham
> Cc: Linus Walleij
> Cc: Grant Likely
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
> Cc: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
> .../dev
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pinctrl for EXYNOS4 SoCs.
>
> Cc: Thomas Abraham
> Cc: Linus Walleij
> Cc: Grant Likely
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
> Cc: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
Thanks!
L
On 01/17/2013 01:34 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
>> From: Thomas Abraham
>>
>> Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pin-controller module
>> EXYNOS5440 SoC.
>>
> (...)
>>
>> pinctrl {
>> - compatible = "samsung,pin
Hi Hiroshi,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 04:43:21PM +, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Will Deacon wrote @ Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:51:14 +0100:
> > Given that this information is not discoverable, it needs to be encoded
> > in the device tree, but where? I can see two approaches:
> >
> > 1. For each IOMMU no
Hi Rui,
Any update?
Please merge these patch series as they have many critical fixes.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 3:57 PM, amit daniel kachhap
wrote:
> Hi Rui,
>
> Any comment on these patches? These are based on new quick cooling
> macros introduced.
> Also my linaro ID is not
From: Jonghwan Choi
Fix "warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function"
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-
From: Jonghwan Choi
When pm handler set freq & voltage, frequency mismatch occurred.
Because freqs.new isn't set in pm handler.
Reported-by: Abhilash Kesavan
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |8 +---
1
Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> Hi Sachin,
>
> On Thursday 17 of January 2013 11:18:12 Sachin Kamat wrote:
> > Added vmmc regulator node in exynos4412-origen.dts file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-origen.dts |9 +
> > 1 files changed, 9 inserti
Chen Gang wrote:
>
Firstly, thanks for your posting.
But there are some comments.
For subject:
Please see the git log before your commit, it should be helpful to you.
In this case, 'ARM: S5PV210: ...' is used.
>
> if not define CONFIG_CPU_S5PV210
>
> it will define NULL in common.h for:
Hi, Arnd, Olof
Here is cleanup headers for Samsung stuff.
AS I commented, this makes local so that they could be removed.
Please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
next/cleanup-header
If any problems, please kindly let me know.
Thanks
- Kukjin
T
Vivek Gautam wrote:
>
> Adding support to parse device node data in order to get
> required properties to set pmu isolation for usb-phy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson
This looks good to me,
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim
Vivek, could yo
On 01/17/2013 02:34 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
>> From: Thomas Abraham
>>
>> Fix the incorrect compatible property value of pin-controller module
>> EXYNOS5440 SoC.
>>
> (...)
>>
>> pinctrl {
>> - compatible = "samsung,pin
Chen,Gang( ??) wrote:
>
>
> > For subject:
> > Please see the git log before your commit, it should be helpful to you.
> > In this case, 'ARM: S5PV210: ...' is used.
>
> thank you, I should notice it next time.
> an incorrect subject is not easy to get maintainer's notice
> maybe it is
Rob Herring wrote:
[...]
>
> As long as we're consistently inconsistent... What about 4210 and 4x12?
> Hopefully, the reason was to avoid breaking them.
>
> This creates horrible incompatibilities between dts and kernel versions
> by changing both. Any prior kernel will not work with this dts o
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> On 01/10/2013 11:33 PM, amit daniel kachhap wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
> >> On 01/10/2013 09:07 PM, amit daniel kachhap wrote:
> >>> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> Hi Amit Daniel,
> >>
> >>> This hotplug noifiers looks fine. I suppose it sh
Cong Ding wrote:
>
> the use of variable tmp is uninitialized, so we fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Ding
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common.c |2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> s3c24xx/common.c
> inde
Jonghwan Choi wrote:
>
> Boot_freq is for saving booting freq. But exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init
> is called in hotplug. If boot_freq is existed in exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init,
> boot_freq could be changed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |4 ++--
> 1 files c
amit kachhap wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Inderpal Singh
> wrote:
> > Add freq_attr attribute to show list of available frequencies.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Donggeun Kim
> > Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham
> > Signed-off-by: KyungMin Park
> > Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh
> > ---
> >
On 01/18/2013 11:33 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Chen,Gang( ??) wrote:
>> thank you, I should notice it next time.
>> an incorrect subject is not easy to get maintainer's notice
>> maybe it is the reason why you can not reply in time, since you can not
>> notice it.
>>
>> :-)
>>
> Just I wa
HI Kukjin,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>
>> Adding support to parse device node data in order to get
>> required properties to set pmu isolation for usb-phy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
>> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki
>> Reviewed-by: Doug A
30 matches
Mail list logo
