[PATCH 1/1] ARM: EXYNOS: Map SYSRAM address through DT

2014-02-19 Thread Sachin Kamat
Instead of hardcoding the SYSRAM details for each SoC, pass this information through device tree (DT) and make the code SoC agnostic. Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat --- Based on top of my earlier patch "ARM: EXYNOS: Consolidate CPU init code" at http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-s

Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Exynos: Add generic compatible string

2014-02-19 Thread Sachin Kamat
Hi Tomasz, On 19 February 2014 18:15, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > [adding linux-arm-kernel ML to CC list] > > > On 19.02.2014 12:34, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> To avoid modifying the kernel every time a new SoC variant >> comes out. > > Since all Exynos chips can be easily recognized usin

Re: Adding set_blob ioctl to DRM

2014-02-19 Thread Rahul Sharma
Thanks Dave, On 20 February 2014 06:54, Dave Airlie wrote: >> I am working on enabling a Color Enhancement block for primary display >> for Exynos SoC. I need to >> set a bunch of parameters like Color Conversion matrix, Contrast >> Improvement parameters etc ~ 30 parameters from User Space. >> >

Re: Adding set_blob ioctl to DRM

2014-02-19 Thread Dave Airlie
> I am working on enabling a Color Enhancement block for primary display > for Exynos SoC. I need to > set a bunch of parameters like Color Conversion matrix, Contrast > Improvement parameters etc ~ 30 parameters from User Space. > > I am planning to use KDS blob property to receive these parameter

Adding set_blob ioctl to DRM

2014-02-19 Thread Rahul Sharma
Hi All, I am working on enabling a Color Enhancement block for primary display for Exynos SoC. I need to set a bunch of parameters like Color Conversion matrix, Contrast Improvement parameters etc ~ 30 parameters from User Space. I am planning to use KDS blob property to receive these parameters.

Re: [PATCH] V4L: s5k6a3: Add DT binding documentation

2014-02-19 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:43:11PM +, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 22/12/13 22:27, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > This patch adds DT binding documentation for the Samsung S5K6A3(YX) > > raw image sensor. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > > --- > >

Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up

2014-02-19 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi Tomasz, Am Samstag, den 11.01.2014, 20:42 +0100 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > This patch introduces generic code to perform power domain look-up using > device tree and automatically bind devices to their power domains. > Generic device tree binding is introduced to specify power domains of > devices

Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: pl011: Move uart_register_driver call to device probe

2014-02-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:47:51PM +, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > anything to complain that people are following the recommendations of > > the maintainer or to demand that this somehow gets hacked around in > > arch/ when we're trying to convince all the architectures to get their > > driv

Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] regulator: s2mps11: Add opmode for S2MPS14 regulators

2014-02-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:19:00PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > As I understand the suspend mode (correct me if I'm wrong), the > regulator core during suspend to mem: > 1. Calls suspend_set_state(). > 2. rstate->disabled is true so the ops->set_suspend_disable() is called. > 3. The ops->se

Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: pl011: Move uart_register_driver call to device probe

2014-02-19 Thread One Thousand Gnomes
> Please try to avoid this sort of misdirected yelling, it's not helping I don't see any misdirected yelling > anything to complain that people are following the recommendations of > the maintainer or to demand that this somehow gets hacked around in > arch/ when we're trying to convince all the

Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] regulator: s2mps11: Add opmode for S2MPS14 regulators

2014-02-19 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 13:08 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:12:09AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 09:35 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I don't understand the above? Are you saying that suspend mode actually > > > turns off the regulator or som

Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: pl011: Move uart_register_driver call to device probe

2014-02-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:09:43AM +, Etched Pixels wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > It's a very real problem which affects actual kernels that distro style > > users are building. > Only because you persist in trying to keep the old static minor > numbers even though they are not needed by an

Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] regulator: s2mps11: Add opmode for S2MPS14 regulators

2014-02-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:09:40AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > I can't only find a way to set this from DTS. There are no bindings for > regulation_constraints->state_{disk,mem,standby}. > Should the driver set manually after obtaining init_data from DTS? Someone should work out a suitab

Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Exynos: Add generic compatible string

2014-02-19 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Sachin, [adding linux-arm-kernel ML to CC list] On 19.02.2014 12:34, Sachin Kamat wrote: To avoid modifying the kernel every time a new SoC variant comes out. Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos4-dt.c |1 + arch/arm/mach-exyn

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: Exynos: Add generic compatible string

2014-02-19 Thread Sachin Kamat
To avoid modifying the kernel every time a new SoC variant comes out. Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos4-dt.c |1 + arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c |1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos

Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] regulator: s2mps11: Add opmode for S2MPS14 regulators

2014-02-19 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 13:08 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:12:09AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 09:35 +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I don't understand the above? Are you saying that suspend mode actually > > > turns off the regulator or som