Re: Linux-next, Exynos Octa boot fail, bisected to: "drm/exynos: remove drm_iommu_attach_device_if_possible"

2015-07-21 Thread Inki Dae
On 2015년 07월 22일 11:02, Joonyoung Shim wrote: > On 07/21/2015 10:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Today's linux-next (next-20150721) encounters boot failures on Exynos >> Octa (Exynos5422) based boards. Th

Re: [PATCH 08/11] MTD: m25p80: Add option to limit SPI transfer size.

2015-07-21 Thread Vinod Koul
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:14:11AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > Or alternatively we could publish the limitations of the channel using > > capabilities so SPI knows I have a dmaengine channel and it can transfer > > max N > > length transfers so would be able to break rather than guessing it

Re: Linux-next, Exynos Octa boot fail, bisected to: "drm/exynos: remove drm_iommu_attach_device_if_possible"

2015-07-21 Thread Joonyoung Shim
On 07/21/2015 10:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > Today's linux-next (next-20150721) encounters boot failures on Exynos > Octa (Exynos5422) based boards. The boards hangs. I bisected it to: > > d80167b85024982c5f18d0481a5c248100360118 is the fi

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: Remove MFD_CROS_EC depends on X86 || ARM

2015-07-21 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:44:28AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Lee, > > On 06/25/2015 10:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > > >> A dependency on X86 || ARM for MFD_CROS_EC was added to fix the warning: > >> > >> (MFD_CROS_EC) s

Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/chrome: Don't make CHROME_PLATFORMS depends on X86 || ARM

2015-07-21 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:20:42AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The Chrome platform support depends on X86 || ARM because there are > only Chromebooks using those architectures. But only some drivers > depend on a given architecture, and the ones that do already have > a dependency on t

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: Remove MFD_CROS_EC depends on X86 || ARM

2015-07-21 Thread Olof Johansson
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: Remove MFD_CROS_EC depends on X86 || ARM] On 25/06/2015 > (Thu 10:44) Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> Hello Lee, >> >> On 06/25/2015 10:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wr

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: Remove MFD_CROS_EC depends on X86 || ARM

2015-07-21 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Paul, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > [Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: Remove MFD_CROS_EC depends on X86 || ARM] On 25/06/2015 > (Thu 10:44) Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> Hello Lee, >> >> On 06/25/2015 10:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Javier Martine

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: Remove MFD_CROS_EC depends on X86 || ARM

2015-07-21 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: Remove MFD_CROS_EC depends on X86 || ARM] On 25/06/2015 (Thu 10:44) Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Lee, > > On 06/25/2015 10:38 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > > >> A dependency on X86 || ARM for MFD_CROS_EC was ad

Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: EXYNOS: mach: Improvements for 4.3

2015-07-21 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 21.07.2015 14:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > 2015-07-21 14:13 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski : >> 2015-07-21 14:02 GMT+09:00 Kukjin Kim : >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: Dear Kukjin, Exynos mach-code related improvements. Description along with a tag. You can find them a

Re: [PATCH v2] clk: exynos4: Fix wrong clock for Exynos4x12 ADC

2015-07-21 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 22.07.2015 07:42, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> The TSADC gate clock was used in Exynos4x12 DTSI for exynos-adc driver. >> However TSADC is present only on Exynos4210 so on Trats2 board (with >> Exynos4412 SoC) the exynos-adc driver could not be probed: >>ERRO

Re: [PATCH v2] clk: exynos4: Fix wrong clock for Exynos4x12 ADC

2015-07-21 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 06/12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The TSADC gate clock was used in Exynos4x12 DTSI for exynos-adc driver. > However TSADC is present only on Exynos4210 so on Trats2 board (with > Exynos4412 SoC) the exynos-adc driver could not be probed: >ERROR: could not get clock /adc@126C:adc(0) >

Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung 1st fixes for v4.2

2015-07-21 Thread Olof Johansson
Hi Kukjin, On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:40:04PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Hi, > > Please pull samsung fixes for v4.2. > > Thanks, > Kukjin > > The following changes since commit d770e558e21961ad6cfdf0ff7df0eb5d7d4f0754: > > Linux 4.2-rc1 (2015-07-05 11:01:52 -0700) > > are available in the g

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/exynos: Convert g2d_userptr_get_dma_addr() to use get_vaddr_frames()

2015-07-21 Thread Jan Kara
On Sat 18-07-15 12:14:12, Inki Dae wrote: > On 2015년 07월 17일 19:31, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On 07/17/2015 12:29 PM, Inki Dae wrote: > >> On 2015년 07월 17일 19:20, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >>> On 07/13/2015 04:55 PM, Jan Kara wrote: > From: Jan Kara > > Convert g2d_userptr_get_dma_addr()

RE: [PATCH v2] thermal: consistently use int for temperatures

2015-07-21 Thread Zhang, Rui
> -Original Message- > From: Punit Agrawal [mailto:punit.agra...@arm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 6:52 PM > To: Sascha Hauer > Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Rui; Eduardo Valentin; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; Jean Delvare; Peter Feuerer; Heiko Stuebner; > Lukasz Majewski

Linux-next, Exynos Octa boot fail, bisected to: "drm/exynos: remove drm_iommu_attach_device_if_possible"

2015-07-21 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
Hi, Today's linux-next (next-20150721) encounters boot failures on Exynos Octa (Exynos5422) based boards. The boards hangs. I bisected it to: d80167b85024982c5f18d0481a5c248100360118 is the first bad commit commit d80167b85024982c5f18d0481a5c248100360118 Author: Joonyoung Shim Date: Thu

Re: [PATCHv7 14/15] cec: s5p-cec: Add s5p-cec driver

2015-07-21 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello, On 2015-07-16 15:09, Hans Verkuil wrote: Marek, Kamil, On 06/29/15 12:14, Hans Verkuil wrote: From: Kamil Debski Add CEC interface driver present in the Samsung Exynos range of SoCs. The following files were based on work by SangPil Moon: - exynos_hdmi_cec.h - exynos_hdmi_cecctl.c S

Re: [PATCH v2] thermal: consistently use int for temperatures

2015-07-21 Thread Punit Agrawal
Hi Sascha, Sascha Hauer writes: > The thermal code uses int, long and unsigned long for temperatures > in different places. > > Using an unsigned type limits the thermal framework to positive > temperatures without need. Also several drivers currently will report > temperatures near UINT_MAX for

Re: [PATCH 08/11] MTD: m25p80: Add option to limit SPI transfer size.

2015-07-21 Thread Michal Suchanek
Hello, On 21 July 2015 at 06:29, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 09:01:34PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 15 July 2015 at 17:59, Brian Norris wrote: >> > Hi Michal, >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:52:27PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> >> The problem is, if you

[PATCH] drivers/irqchip: replace pr_warning by pr_warn

2015-07-21 Thread Wang Long
Update the last pr_warning callsite in drivers/irqchip. Signed-off-by: Wang Long --- drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c b/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c index 5c82e3b..80104f9 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH] thermal: consistently use int for temperatures

2015-07-21 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi Punit, On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:14:36PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > Sascha Hauer writes: > > > The thermal code uses int, long and unsigned long for temperatures > > in different places. > > > > Using an unsigned type limits the thermal framework to positive > > temperatur

[PATCH v2] thermal: consistently use int for temperatures

2015-07-21 Thread Sascha Hauer
The thermal code uses int, long and unsigned long for temperatures in different places. Using an unsigned type limits the thermal framework to positive temperatures without need. Also several drivers currently will report temperatures near UINT_MAX for temperatures below 0°C. This will probably im