Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: sec-core: Rename MFD and regulator names differently

2015-10-30 20:01 GMT+09:00 Alim Akhtar : > Currently S2MPSXX multifunction device is named as *-pmic, > and this MFD also supports regulator as a one of its MFD cell which > has the same name, which is a bit confusing. > > We did discussed different approaches about how

[PATCH v9 09/17] dt-bindings: add document for rockchip variant of analogix_dp

Rockchip DP driver is a helper driver of analogix_dp coder driver, so most of the DT property should be descriped in analogix_dp document. Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner --- Changes in

Re: [PATCH v9 09/17] dt-bindings: add document for rockchip variant of analogix_dp

On 10/31/2015 02:30 PM, Yakir Yang wrote: Rockchip DP driver is a helper driver of analogix_dp coder driver, so most of the DT property should be descriped in analogix_dp document. Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang Reviewed-by:

[PATCH v10 09/17] dt-bindings: add document for rockchip variant of analogix_dp

Rockchip DP driver is a helper driver of analogix_dp coder driver, so most of the DT property should be descriped in analogix_dp document. Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang --- Changes in v10: - Removed the duplicated signed-of. Changes

Re: [PATCH v10 09/17] dt-bindings: add document for rockchip variant of analogix_dp

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Yakir Yang wrote: > Rockchip DP driver is a helper driver of analogix_dp coder driver, > so most of the DT property should be descriped in analogix_dp document. > > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner > Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang